Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26103164›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Hypertrophic and Pseudo-Hypertrophic Changes in Lower Leg Muscles of Boys with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Their Relationship to Functional Measurements.

Ravneet S Vohra, Donovan Lott, Sunita Mathur, Claudia Senesac, Jasjit Deol, Sean Germain, Roxanna Bendixen, Sean C Forbes, H Lee Sweeney, Glenn A Walter and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ravneet S VohraDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Donovan LottDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Sunita MathurDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Claudia SenesacDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Jasjit DeolDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Sean GermainDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Roxanna BendixenDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL, United States of America.
Sean C ForbesDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
H Lee SweeneyDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Glenn A WalterDepartment of Physiology and Functional Genomics, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL, United States of America.
Krista VandenborneDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
University of Florida · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Training and education CoreU54AR052646 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MCNALLY, ELIZABETH M, SWEENEY, H LEE · 2005 to 2020
$24.1M
Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biomarkers for Muscular DystropyR01AR056973 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI VANDENBORNE, KRISTA H · 2010 to 2024
$20.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056973NIAMS NIH HHS U54 AR052646NIAMS NIH HHS U54AR052646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe primary objectives of this study were to evaluate contractile and non-contractile content of lower leg muscles of boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and determine the relationships between non-contractile content and functional abilities.

methodsLower leg muscles of thirty-two boys with DMD and sixteen age matched unaffected controls were imaged. Non-contractile content, contractile cross sectional area and non-contractile cross sectional area of lower leg muscles (tibialis anterior, extensor digitorum longus, peroneal, medial gastrocnemius and soleus) were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Muscle strength, timed functional tests and the Brooke lower extremity score were also assessed.

resultsNon-contractile content of lower leg muscles (peroneal, medial gastrocnemius, and soleus) was significantly greater than control group (p<0.05). Non-contractile content of lower leg muscles correlated with Brooke score (rs = 0.64-0.84) and 30 feet walk (rs = 0.66-0.80). Dorsiflexor (DF) and plantarflexor (PF) specific torque was significantly different between the groups. DISCUSSION: Overall, non-contractile content of the lower leg muscles was greater in DMD than controls. Furthermore, there was an age dependent increase in contractile content in the medial gastrocnemius of boys with DMD. The findings of this study suggest that T1 weighted MR images can be used to monitor disease progression and provide a quantitative estimate of contractile and non-contractile content of tissue in children with DMD.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolHumansHypertrophyLegMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalMuscular Dystrophy, Duchenne

Identifiers

PMID26103164
PMCPMC4477876
OpenAlexW804694437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.