Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26102375›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2015

Risk Prediction for Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in a Medicaid Population.

Neera K Goyal, Eric S Hall, James M Greenberg, Elizabeth A Kelly

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Pre-pregnancy or first-trimester risk scoring to identify women at high risk of preterm birth.European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2018
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Neera K Goyal1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, Ohio.
Eric S Hall1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, Ohio.
James M Greenberg1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, Ohio.
Elizabeth A Kelly2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati, Ohio.
University of Cincinnati · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

Ohio Interdisciplinary Women's Health Career TrainingK12HD051953 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI TSEVAT, JOEL · 2005 to 2014
$4.2M
NICHD NIH HHS 5K12HD051953-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite prior efforts to develop pregnancy risk prediction models, there remains a lack of evidence to guide implementation in clinical practice. The current aim was to develop and validate a risk tool grounded in social determinants theory for use among at-risk Medicaid patients.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of 409 women across 17 Cincinnati health centers between September 2013 and April 2014. The primary outcomes included preterm birth, low birth weight, intrauterine fetal demise, and neonatal death. After random allocation into derivation and validation samples, a multivariable model was developed, and a risk scoring system was assessed and validated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values.

resultsThe derived multivariable model (n=263) included: prior preterm birth, interpregnancy interval, late prenatal care, comorbid conditions, history of childhood abuse, substance use, tobacco use, body mass index, race, twin gestation, and short cervical length. Using a weighted risk score, each additional point was associated with an odds ratio of 1.57 for adverse outcomes, p<0.001, AUROC=0.79. In the validation sample (n=146), each additional point conferred an odds ratio of 1.20, p=0.03, AUROC=0.63. Using a cutoff of 20% probability for the outcome, sensitivity was 29%, with specificity 82%. Positive and negative predictive values were 22% and 85%, respectively.

conclusionsRisk scoring based on social determinants can discriminate pregnancy risk within a Medicaid population; however, performance is modest and consistent with prior prediction models. Future research is needed to evaluate whether implementation of risk scoring in Medicaid prenatal care programs improves clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Birth WeightPatient Acceptance of Health CarePremature BirthAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMedicaidMultivariate AnalysisOhioPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePrenatal CareReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID26102375
PMCPMC4543486
OpenAlexW2117718260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.