Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26102359›Full record

ArticleChannels (Austin, Tex.)2015

Direct injection of cell-free Kir1.1 protein into Xenopus oocytes replicates single-channel currents derived from Kir1.1 mRNA.

Henry Sackin, Mikheil Nanazashvili, Shin-ichi Makino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Channels (Austin, Tex.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Henry Sackina Department of Physiology & Biophysics ; The Chicago Medical School; Rosalind Franklin University ; Chicago , IL USA.
Mikheil Nanazashvili
Shin-ichi Makino
Madison Group (United States) · USRosalind Franklin Institute · GBRosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science · US

Funding

MOLECULAR CLONING OF EPITHELIAL K CHANNELSR01DK046950 · NIDDK · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SACKIN, HENRY · 1996 to 2017
$5.4M
Molecular Cloning of Epithelial K ChannelsR56DK046950 · NIDDK · ROSALIND FRANKLIN UNIV OF MEDICINE & SCI · PI SACKIN, HENRY · 2008 to 2008
$231k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK46950NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK046950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of integral membrane protein cell-free synthesis permits in-vitro labeling of accessible cysteines for real-time FRET and LRET measurements. The functional integrity of these synthetic ion channel proteins has been verified at the whole oocyte level by direct injection into, and recording from, Xenopus oocytes. However, the microscopic single-channel properties of cell-free translated protein have not been systematically examined. In the present study, we compare patch-clamp currents originating from cell-free protein with currents derived from mRNA injection, using the same (single-Cys) inward rectifier DNA template (C189-Kir1.1b). Results indicate that cell-free Kir protein, incorporated into liposomes and injected into oocytes, is trafficked to the plasma membrane where it inserts in an outside-out orientation and exhibits single-channel characteristics identical to that derived from a corresponding mRNA.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MembraneElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelFemaleHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMembrane PotentialsMicroinjectionsOocytesPatch-Clamp TechniquesPotassium Channels, Inwardly RectifyingRNA, MessengerXenopus laevisPotassium Channels, Inwardly RectifyingRNA, Messengerinward rectifierpatch-clampproteoliposomerenalROMK

Identifiers

PMID26102359
PMCPMC4594486
OpenAlexW1524311423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.