Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26102358›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2015

Endocytosis of Nanomedicines: The Case of Glycopeptide Engineered PLGA Nanoparticles.

Antonietta Vilella, Barbara Ruozi, Daniela Belletti, Francesca Pederzoli, Marianna Galliani, Valentina Semeghini, Flavio Forni, Michele Zoli, Maria Angela Vandelli, Giovanni Tosi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Biomimetic cell membrane-coated poly(lactic-Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Possible strategies to cross the blood-brain barrier.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Nanoformulated Antiretrovirals for Penetration of the Central Nervous System: State of the Art.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antonietta VilellaDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena 41124, Italy. antonietta.vilella@unimore.it.
Barbara RuoziNanomedicine Group, Te.Far.T.I. Center, Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena 41124, Italy. barbara.ruozi@unimore.it.
Daniela BellettiNanomedicine Group, Te.Far.T.I. Center, Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena 41124, Italy. daniela.belletti@unimore.it.
Francesca PederzoliNanomedicine Group, Te.Far.T.I. Center, Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena 41124, Italy. francesca.pederzoli@gmail.com.
Marianna GallianiNanomedicine Group, Te.Far.T.I. Center, Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena 41124, Italy. marianna.galliani@gmail.com.
Valentina SemeghiniDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena 41124, Italy. vsvalesuzz@gmail.com.
Flavio ForniNanomedicine Group, Te.Far.T.I. Center, Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena 41124, Italy. forni.flavio@unimore.it.
Michele ZoliNanomedicine Group, Te.Far.T.I. Center, Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena 41124, Italy. zoli.michele@unimore.it.
Maria Angela VandelliNanomedicine Group, Te.Far.T.I. Center, Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena 41124, Italy. vandelli.mariaangela@unimore.it.
Giovanni TosiNanomedicine Group, Te.Far.T.I. Center, Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena 41124, Italy. gtosi@unimore.it.
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of nanomedicine as a new strategy for drug delivery and targeting prompted the interest in developing approaches toward basic and clinical neuroscience. Despite enormous advances on brain research, central nervous system (CNS) disorders remain the world's leading cause of disability, in part due to the inability of the majority of drugs to reach the brain parenchyma. Many attempts to use nanomedicines as CNS drug delivery systems (DDS) were made; among the various non-invasive approaches, nanoparticulate carriers and, particularly, polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) seem to be the most interesting strategies. In particular, the ability of poly-lactide-co-glycolide NPs (PLGA-NPs) specifically engineered with a glycopeptide (g7), conferring to NPs' ability to cross the blood brain barrier (BBB) in rodents at a concentration of up to 10% of the injected dose, was demonstrated in previous studies using different routes of administrations. Most of the evidence on NP uptake mechanisms reported in the literature about intracellular pathways and processes of cell entry is based on in vitro studies. Therefore, beside the particular attention devoted to increasing the knowledge of the rate of in vivo BBB crossing of nanocarriers, the subsequent exocytosis in the brain compartments, their fate and trafficking in the brain surely represent major topics in this field.

Indexed as

blood brain barriercellular uptakeendocytosisnanomedicineneuron

Identifiers

PMID26102358
PMCPMC4491652
OpenAlexW1520286824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.