Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26101310›Full record

GuidelineJournal of feline medicine and surgery2015

Blood transfusion in cats: ABCD guidelines for minimising risks of infectious iatrogenic complications.

Maria Grazia Pennisi, Katrin Hartmann, Diane D Addie, Hans Lutz, Tim Gruffydd-Jones, Corine Boucraut-Baralon, Herman Egberink, Tadeusz Frymus, Marian C Horzinek, Margaret J Hosie and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Presence, genetic characterization, geographic distribution and associated risk factors of feline hemoplasmas in Paraguay.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  5. Prevalence and Diversity of HaemotropicVeterinary sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Wild Felids Blood Group System.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  14. Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Grazia Pennisi
Katrin Hartmann
Diane D Addie
Hans Lutz
Tim Gruffydd-Jones
Corine Boucraut-Baralon
Herman Egberink
Tadeusz Frymus
Marian C Horzinek
Margaret J Hosie
Albert Lloret
Fulvio Marsilio
Alan D Radford
Etienne Thiry
Uwe Truyen
Karin Möstl
European Advisory Board on Cat Diseases
University of Liège · BEUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D008425/1Medical Research Council G0300387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

overviewThe availability of blood components has increased the number of indications for transfusing cats, and fresh whole blood is readily accessible to clinicians because it can be taken from in-house donor cats or 'volunteer' feline blood donors. A certain amount of risk remains to the recipient cat, as immediate or delayed adverse reactions can occur during or after transfusion, related to immunemediated mechanisms. This article, however, focuses on adverse events caused by infectious agents, which may originate either from contamination of blood following incorrect collection, storage or transfusion, or from transfusion of contaminated blood obtained from an infected donor. PREVENTION OF BLOOD CONTAMINATION: In cats, blood cannot be collected through a closed system and, therefore, collection of donor blood requires a multi-step manipulation of syringes and other devices. It is crucial that each step of the procedure is performed under the strictest aseptic conditions and that bacterial contamination of blood bags is prevented, as bacterial endotoxins can cause an immediate febrile reaction or even fatal shock in the recipient cat. PREVENTION OF DISEASE TRANSMISSION: With a view to preventing transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases, the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine has adopted basic criteria for selecting pathogens to be tested for in donor pets. The worldwide core screening panel for donor cats includes feline leukaemia virus, feline immunodeficiency virus, Bartonella species and feline haemoplasma. The list should be adapted to the local epidemiological situation concerning other vector-borne feline infections. The most practical, rapid and inexpensive measure to reduce transfusion risk is to check the risk profile of donor cats on the basis of a written questionnaire. Blood transfusion can never, however, be considered entirely safe.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimal WelfareBlood TransfusionCat DiseasesCatsCommunicable DiseasesIatrogenic DiseaseImmunodeficiency Virus, FelineTransfusion ReactionVeterinary Medicine

Identifiers

PMID26101310
PMCPMC11148932
OpenAlexW2160717874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.