Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26101141›Full record

ReviewQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2016

Ambulatory and diary methods can facilitate the measurement of patient-reported outcomes.

Stefan Schneider, Arthur A Stone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefan SchneiderDornsife Center for Self-Report Science, Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, 635 Downey Way, Los Angeles, CA, 90089-3332, USA. schneids@usc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4562-0524
Arthur A StoneDornsife Center for Self-Report Science, Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, 635 Downey Way, Los Angeles, CA, 90089-3332, USA.

Funding

Understanding and Improving Healthcare Decision-Making and Outcomes for People Living with Alzheimer's Disease and Related DementiasP01AG005842 · NIA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI JOSEPH J DOYLE · 1986 to 2026
$56.5M
Frame of Reference Effects in Health Disparities ResearchR01AG042407 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI STONE, ARTHUR A · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
Dimensions of Subjective Well-Being: Aging, Religiosity, and AdaptationR01AG040629 · NIA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI DEATON, ANGUS S. · 2011 to 2015
$1.0M
NIA NIH HHS 5R01AG040629NIA NIH HHS P01 AG005842NIA NIH HHS P01 AG05842NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040629NIA NIH HHS R01 AG042407NIA NIH HHS R01 AG042407-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAmbulatory and diary methods of self-reported symptoms and well-being have received increasing interest in recent years. These methods are a valuable addition to traditional strategies for the assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in that they capture patients' recent symptom experiences repeatedly in their natural environments. In this article, we review ways that incorporating diary methods into PRO measurement can facilitate research on quality of life.

methodsSeveral diary methods are currently available, and they include "real-time" (Ecological Momentary Assessment) and "near-real-time" (end-of-day assessments, Day Reconstruction Method) formats. We identify the key benefits of these methods for PRO research.

results(1) In validity testing, diary assessments can serve as a standard for evaluating the ecological validity and for identifying recall biases of PRO instruments with longer-term recall formats. (2) In research and clinical settings, diaries have the ability to closely capture variations and dynamic changes in quality of life that are difficult or not possible to obtain from traditional PRO assessments. (3) In test construction, repeated diary assessments can expand understanding of the measurement characteristics (e.g., reliability, dimensionality) of PROs in that parameters for differences between people can be compared with those for variation within people.

conclusionsDiary assessment strategies can enrich the repertoire of PRO assessment tools and enhance the measurement of patients' quality of life.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsMedical RecordsPatient Outcome AssessmentQuality of LifeSelf ReportHumansMental RecallReproducibility of ResultsAmbulatory measurementDay Reconstruction MethodDiariesEcological Momentary AssessmentPatient-reported outcomesRecall

Identifiers

PMID26101141
PMCPMC4689672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.