ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2015
Laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in two patients who failed percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoscopically assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy performed for remnant stomach in patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a case report.Surgical case reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Laparoscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy.Current gastroenterology reports · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a common procedure to obtain a feeding tube. However, this technique might imply several difficulties and complications. The inability to transilluminate the abdominal wall may occur frequently, especially in obese or multi-operated patients. With the emergence of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (LAPEG) might provide a safe and efficient alternative. PRESENTATION OF CASES: We report hereby two cases of patients having undergone LAPEG in our institution. Conventional PEGs were deemed impossible because of the absence of transillumination and motivated a surgical approach. Two obese patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 31 and 45kg/m(2) respectively presented neurological condition (stroke and Parkinson's disease) requiring a feeding tube. While a PEG was unsuccessful (impossibility to transilluminate), a LAPEG was attempted. The procedure and the recovery were uneventful. DISCUSSION: There are different techniques for gastrostomy tube placement: open gastrostomy, PEG and radiologic procedure. The PEG is associated with a significant risk of bowel perforation. LAPEG seems to be an interesting option in order to avoid an open gastrostomy in patients in whom a PEG cannot be performed. This is especially true in obese patients, where a transillumination cannot be performed. It offers an endoscopic view of the stomach simultaneously to the laparoscopic approach that allows a potential decrease of major complications.
conclusionWhile the literature reports mainly pediatric cases, we present herein two successful LAPEG in adult obese patients. In case of impossibility to perform PEG, this technique allows a safe direct visualization of the stomach and other adjacent organs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.