Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26100944›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2016

Real-time cancer diagnosis during prostate biopsy: ex vivo evaluation of full-field optical coherence tomography (FFOCT) imaging on biopsy cores.

Jonathan Lopater, Pierre Colin, Frédéric Beuvon, Mathilde Sibony, Eugénie Dalimier, François Cornud, Nicolas Barry Delongchamps

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The clinical usefulness of optical coherence tomography during cancer interventions.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Assessing Histology Structures byFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan LopaterService d'Urologie, Hôpital Cochin, Paris Descartes University, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.
Pierre ColinDepartment of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Frédéric BeuvonDepartment of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Mathilde SibonyDepartment of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Eugénie DalimierLLTech SAS, Paris, France.
François CornudDepartment of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Nicolas Barry DelongchampsService d'Urologie, Hôpital Cochin, Paris Descartes University, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France. nicolasbdl@hotmail.com.
Délégation Paris 5 · FRHôpital Cochin · FRLight for Life Technologies (France) · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy (Acc) of full-field optical coherence tomography (FFOCT) for cancer detection on prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-eight consecutive patients with elevated PSA and/or suspicious digital rectal examination were prospectively included. For each patient, 1-10 cores were randomly selected and imaged with FFOCT immediately after sampling. The images obtained were de-identified and analyzed by three pathologists blinded to the results of pathological evaluation. The overall average Acc was measured, as well as sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV). The Acc learning curve was assessed by multivariate logistic regression, and inter-reader concordance was assessed by Kappa index.

resultsOne hundred and nineteen cores were imaged. Of them, 40 (33.6%) were involved with cancer. The overall average Acc of FFOCT for cancer detection was of 70.6%. Se, Sp, PPV, and NPV were of 63, 74, 55.5, and 80%, respectively. A substantial agreement was observed among pathologists (κ = 0.6, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, Acc was associated with the number of previously interpreted cases, with a predicted Acc of 82% at the end of learning curve. The overall average accuracy for high Gleason score (>3 + 3) determination was of 72%, although results were limited by the small amount of cases.

conclusionsFFOCT of prostate biopsy cores may provide a diagnostic accuracy greater than 80%, with a good reliability and a high NPV. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: "Full-field optical coherence tomography is a novel imaging modality that could have a potential value in real-time diagnosis of prostate cancer during prostate biopsy procedures."

Indexed as

AgedHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProstateProstatic NeoplasmsTime FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceBiopsyDiagnosticFull-field optical coherence tomographyProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID26100944
OpenAlexW631039010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.