Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26100899›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Generating new prions by targeted mutation or segment duplication.

Kacy R Paul, Connor G Hendrich, Aubrey Waechter, Madison R Harman, Eric D Ross

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anti-Prion Systems in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Journal of neurochemistry · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Composition-based prediction and rational manipulation of prion-like domain recruitment to stress granules.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The causes of evolvability and their evolution.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Amino acid composition predicts prion activity.PLoS computational biology · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Prions are affected by evolution at two levels.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kacy R PaulDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Connor G HendrichDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Aubrey WaechterDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Madison R HarmanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Eric D RossDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Eric.Ross@colostate.edu.
Colorado State University · US

Funding

The determinants of aggregation and toxicity of prion-like domainsR01GM105991 · NIGMS · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROSS, ERIC D · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM105991NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yeasts contain various protein-based genetic elements, termed prions, that result from the structural conversion of proteins into self-propagating amyloid forms. Most yeast prion proteins contain glutamine/asparagine (Q/N)-rich prion domains that drive prion activity. Here, we explore two mechanisms by which new prion domains could evolve. First, it has been proposed that mutation and natural selection will tend to result in proteins with aggregation propensities just low enough to function under physiological conditions and thus that a small number of mutations are often sufficient to cause aggregation. We hypothesized that if the ability to form prion aggregates was a sufficiently generic feature of Q/N-rich domains, many nonprion Q/N-rich domains might similarly have aggregation propensities on the edge of prion formation. Indeed, we tested four yeast Q/N-rich domains that had no detectable aggregation activity; in each case, a small number of rationally designed mutations were sufficient to cause the proteins to aggregate and, for two of the domains, to create prion activity. Second, oligopeptide repeats are found in multiple prion proteins, and expansion of these repeats increases prion activity. However, it is unclear whether the effects of repeat expansion are unique to these specific sequences or are a generic result of adding additional aggregation-prone segments into a protein domain. We found that within nonprion Q/N-rich domains, repeating aggregation-prone segments in tandem was sufficient to create prion activity. Duplication of DNA elements is a common source of genetic variation and may provide a simple mechanism to rapidly evolve prion activity.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationMutationAmino Acid SequenceMolecular Sequence DataPrionsSequence Homology, Amino AcidYeastsPrionsamyloidprionSup35yeast

Identifiers

PMID26100899
PMCPMC4507246
OpenAlexW2105148157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.