Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26100867›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Cellular immune correlates analysis of an HIV-1 preexposure prophylaxis trial.

Peter J Kuebler, Megha L Mehrotra, J Jeff McConnell, Sara J Holditch, Brian I Shaw, Leandro F Tarosso, Kaitlyn S Leadabrand, Jeffrey M Milush, Vanessa A York, Rui André Saraiva Raposo and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. HIV-1-specific CD8PNAS nexus · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter J KueblerDivision of Experimental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94110; peter.kuebler@ucsf.edu.
Megha L MehrotraInstitute of Virology & Immunology, Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA 94158;
J Jeff McConnellInstitute of Virology & Immunology, Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA 94158;
Sara J HolditchDivision of Experimental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94110;
Brian I ShawDivision of Experimental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94110;
Leandro F TarossoDivision of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil 01246;
Kaitlyn S LeadabrandDivision of Experimental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94110;
Jeffrey M MilushDivision of Experimental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94110;
Vanessa A YorkDivision of Experimental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94110;
Rui André Saraiva RaposoDivision of Experimental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94110; Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Tropical Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037;
Rex G ChengDivision of Experimental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94110;
Emily M ErikssonDivision of Experimental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94110;
Vanessa McMahanInstitute of Virology & Immunology, Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA 94158;
David V GliddenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158;
Stephen ShiboskiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158;
Robert M GrantInstitute of Virology & Immunology, Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA 94158; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143.
Douglas F NixonDivision of Experimental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94110; Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Tropical Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037;
Esper G KallásDivision of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil 01246;
University of California, San Francisco · USGladstone Institutes · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

UCSF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR024131 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSTON, S. CLAIBORNE · 2006 to 2011
$111.2M
Chemoprophylaxis for HIV Prevention in Men SupplementU01AI064002 · NIAID · J. DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES · PI GRANT, ROBERT M. · 2005 to 2011
$41.3M
Chemoprophylaxis and HIV-Host InteractionsR01AI062333 · NIAID · J. DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES · PI GRANT, ROBERT M. · 2004 to 2011
$6.2M
Chemoprophylaxis and HIV Host InteractionsR01AI118575 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRANT, ROBERT M. · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Protective immunity in HIV Highly exposed but uninfected subjectsR21AI087131 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI NIXON, DOUGLAS F · 2010 to 2011
$647k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCRR NIH HHS RR024131NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024131NIAID NIH HHS AI087131NIAID NIH HHS AI62333NIAID NIH HHS AI64002NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI062333NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118575NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI087131NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI064002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV-1-specific T-cell responses in exposed seronegative subjects suggest that a viral breach of the exposure site is more common than current transmission rates would suggest and that host immunity can extinguish subsequent infection foci. The Preexposure Prophylaxis Initiative (iPrEx) chemoprophylaxis trial provided an opportunity to rigorously investigate these responses in a case-control immunology study; 84 preinfection peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples from individuals enrolled in the iPrEx trial who later seroconverted were matched with 480 samples from enrolled subjects who remained seronegative from both the placebo and active treatment arms. T-cell responses to HIV-1 Gag, Protease, Integrase, Reverse Transcriptase, Vif, and Nef antigens were quantified for all subjects in an IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay. IFN-γ responses varied in magnitude and frequency across subjects. A positive response was more prevalent in those who remained persistently HIV-1-negative for Gag (P = 0.007), Integrase (P < 0.001), Vif (P < 0.001), and Nef (P < 0.001). When correlated with outcomes in the iPrEx trial, Vif- and Integrase-specific T-cell responses were associated with reduced HIV-1 infection risk [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.36, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.19-0.66 and HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.28-0.96, respectively]. Antigen-specific responses were independent of emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate use. IFN-γ secretion in the ELISpot was confirmed using multiparametric flow cytometry and largely attributed to effector memory CD4+ or CD8+ T cells. Our results show that HIV-1-specific T-cell immunity can be detected in exposed but uninfected individuals and that these T-cell responses can differentiate individuals according to infection outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultCase-Control StudiesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFlow CytometryHIV-1HIV InfectionsHIV SeropositivityHuman Immunodeficiency Virus ProteinsHumansImmunity, CellularInterferon-gammaLeukocytes, MononuclearLogistic ModelsHuman Immunodeficiency Virus ProteinsInterferon-gammadesignated HIV-1–exposed seronegativeHIV-1preexposure chemoprophylaxisT cellvaccine

Identifiers

PMID26100867
PMCPMC4500209
OpenAlexW1954600066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.