Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26100741›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2015

Mammalian touch catches up.

Carolyn M Walsh, Diana M Bautista, Ellen A Lumpkin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Membrane Stretch Gates NMDA Receptors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Role of PIEZO2 in Human Mechanosensation.The New England journal of medicine · 2016
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carolyn M WalshDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200, USA.
Diana M BautistaDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200, USA. Electronic address: dbautista@berkeley.edu.
Ellen A LumpkinDepartment of Dermatology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY 10032, USA; Department of Physiology & Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY 10032, USA. Electronic address: eal2166@columbia.edu.

Funding

THE MOLECULAR BASIS OF CELL FUNCTIONT32GM007232 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BILDER, DAVID, UNAL, ELCIN · 1985 to 2022
$36.4M
Mechanisms of mechanosensory transduction in Merkel cellsR01AR051219 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LUMPKIN, ELLEN A · 2004 to 2020
$6.0M
Peripheral Mechanisms Governing Tactile Encoding During Normal Target RemodelingR01NS073119 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GERLING, GREGORY JOHN, LUMPKIN, ELLEN A · 2010 to 2016
$2.5M
New approaches to identify molecular mechanisms of touch and pain in mammalsDP2OD007123 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BAUTISTA, DIANA MICHELE · 2010 to 2010
$2.3M
Roles and functions of ion channels that mediate mammalian touch transduction.R01AR059385 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BAUTISTA, DIANA MICHELE · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS AR059385NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR051219NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR059385NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007232NIH HHS DP2 OD007123NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073119NINDS NIH HHS R01NS073119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An assortment of touch receptors innervate the skin and encode different tactile features of the environment. Compared with invertebrate touch and other sensory systems, our understanding of the molecular and cellular underpinnings of mammalian touch lags behind. Two recent breakthroughs have accelerated progress. First, an arsenal of cell-type-specific molecular markers allowed the functional and anatomical properties of sensory neurons to be matched, thereby unraveling a cellular code for touch. Such markers have also revealed key roles of non-neuronal cell types, such as Merkel cells and keratinocytes, in touch reception. Second, the discovery of Piezo genes as a new family of mechanically activated channels has fueled the discovery of molecular mechanisms that mediate and mechanotransduction in mammalian touch receptors.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansKeratinocytesMammalsMechanoreceptorsMechanotransduction, CellularMerkel CellsTouch

Identifiers

PMID26100741
PMCPMC4577443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.