Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26100708›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Multicenter retrospective study of cefmetazole and flomoxef for treatment of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli bacteremia.

Yasufumi Matsumura, Masaki Yamamoto, Miki Nagao, Toshiaki Komori, Naohisa Fujita, Akihiko Hayashi, Tsunehiro Shimizu, Harumi Watanabe, Shoichi Doi, Michio Tanaka and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Microbiology spectrum · 2021
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Clinical Outcomes of Single-Dose Flomoxef Prophylaxis for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Single-Center Study of 834 Cases.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yasufumi MatsumuraDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan yazblood@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8595-8944
Masaki YamamotoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Miki NagaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Toshiaki KomoriDepartment of Infection Control and Clinical Laboratory, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Naohisa FujitaDepartment of Infection Control and Clinical Laboratory, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Akihiko HayashiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Kyoto City Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Tsunehiro ShimizuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Kyoto City Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Harumi WatanabeDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Kyoto-Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Shoichi DoiDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyoto-Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Michio TanakaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Shunji TakakuraDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Satoshi IchiyamaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPKyoto City Hospital · JPKyoto Katsura Hospital · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of cefmetazole and flomoxef (CF) for the treatment of patients with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) bacteremia (ESBL-CF group) was compared with that of carbapenem treatment for ESBL-EC patients (ESBL-carbapenem group) and with that of CF treatment in patients with non-ESBL-EC bacteremia (non-ESBL-CF group). Adult patients treated for E. coli bacteremia in four hospitals were retrospectively evaluated. The 30-day mortality rates in patients belonging to the ESBL-CF, ESBL-carbapenem, and non-ESBL-CF groups were compared as 2 (empirical and definitive therapy) cohorts. The adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for mortality were calculated using Cox regression models with weighting according to the inverse probability of propensity scores for receiving CF or carbapenem treatment. The empirical-therapy cohort included 104 patients (ESBL-CF, 26; ESBL-carbapenem, 45; non-ESBL-CF, 33), and the definitive-therapy cohort included 133 patients (ESBL-CF, 59; ESBL-carbapenem, 54; non-ESBL-CF, 20). The crude 30-day mortality rates for patients in the ESBL-CF, ESBL-carbapenem, and non-ESBL-CF groups were, respectively, 7.7%, 8.9%, and 3.0% in the empirical-therapy cohort and 5.1%, 9.3%, and 5.0% in the definitve-therapy cohort. In patients without hematological malignancy and neutropenia, CF treatment for ESBL-EC patients was not associated with mortality compared with carbapenem treatment (empirical-therapy cohort: aHR, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11 to 6.52; definitive therapy cohort: aHR, 1.04; CI, 0.24 to 4.49). CF therapy may represent an effective alternative to carbapenem treatment for patients with ESBL-EC bacteremia for empirical and definitive therapy in adult patients who do not have hematological malignancy and neutropenia.

Indexed as

AgedBacteremiabeta-LactamasesCefmetazoleCephalosporinsEscherichia coliFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedbeta-LactamasesCefmetazoleCephalosporinsflomoxef

Identifiers

PMID26100708
PMCPMC4538479
OpenAlexW2134906113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.