Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26100608›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2015

Maternal immunity enhances systemic recall immune responses upon oral immunization of piglets with F4 fimbriae.

Ut V Nguyen, Vesna Melkebeek, Bert Devriendt, Tiphanie Goetstouwers, Mario Van Poucke, Luc Peelman, Bruno M Goddeeris, Eric Cox

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A Virus-like Particle-Based F4 EnterotoxigenicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Methodology and application ofJournal of animal science and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  8. Zinc oxide enriched peat influencePorcine health management · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ut V NguyenLaboratory of Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium. Nguyen.VanUt@UGent.be.
Vesna MelkebeekLaboratory of Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium. Vesna_Melkebeek@hotmail.com.
Bert DevriendtLaboratory of Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium. B.Devriendt@ugent.be.
Tiphanie GoetstouwersLaboratory of Animal Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Heidestraat 19, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium. tgoetsto@gmail.com.
Mario Van PouckeLaboratory of Animal Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Heidestraat 19, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium. Mario.vanpoucke@ugent.be.
Luc PeelmanLaboratory of Animal Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Heidestraat 19, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium. Luc.Peelman@ugent.be.
Bruno M GoddeerisLaboratory of Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium. Bruno.Goddeeris@kuleuven.be.
Eric CoxLaboratory of Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium. Eric.Cox@ugent.be.
Ghent University · BEKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

F4 enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) cause diarrhoea and mortality in piglets leading to severe economic losses. Oral immunization of piglets with F4 fimbriae induces a protective intestinal immune response evidenced by an F4-specific serum and intestinal IgA response. However, successful oral immunization of pigs with F4 fimbriae in the presence of maternal immunity has not been demonstrated yet. In the present study we aimed to evaluate the effect of maternal immunity on the induction of a systemic immune response upon oral immunization of piglets. Whereas F4-specific IgG and IgA could be induced by oral immunization of pigs without maternal antibodies and by intramuscular immunization of pigs with maternal antibodies, no such response was seen in the orally immunized animals with maternal antibodies. Since maternal antibodies can mask an antibody response, we also looked by ELIspot assays for circulating F4-specific antibody secreting cells (ASCs). Enumerating the F4-specific ASCs within the circulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and the number of F4-specific IgA ASCs within the circulating IgA(+) B-cells revealed an F4-specific immune response in the orally immunized animals with maternal antibodies. Interestingly, results suggest a more robust IgA booster response by oral immunization of pigs with than without maternal antibodies. These results demonstrate that oral immunization of piglets with F4-specific maternal antibodies is feasible and that these maternal antibodies seem to enhance the secondary systemic immune response. Furthermore, our ELIspot assay on enriched IgA(+) B-cells could be used as a screening procedure to optimize mucosal immunization protocols in pigs with maternal immunity.

Indexed as

Immunity, Maternally-AcquiredImmunity, MucosalAdministration, OralAnimalsEnterotoxigenic Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli VaccinesFimbriae, BacterialImmunizationSwineSwine DiseasesEscherichia coli Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID26100608
PMCPMC4476233
OpenAlexW1817136560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.