Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26100349›Full record

Trial reportAdvances in therapy2015

Tiotropium and Salmeterol in COPD Patients at Risk of Exacerbations: A Post Hoc Analysis from POET-COPD(®).

Claus F Vogelmeier, Guus M Asijee, Katrin Kupas, Kai M Beeh

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00563381 (Effect of Inhalation of Tiotropium Once Daily 18 Mcg Versus Salmeterol Twice Daily 50 Mcg on Time to First Exacerbation in COPD Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00563381 phase4completednot on this map

Effect of Inhalation of Tiotropium Once Daily 18 Mcg Versus Salmeterol Twice Daily 50 Mcg on Time to First Exacerbation in COPD Patients (a Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel Group, One-year Study).

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2008Enrolled7,376ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsTiotropium bromide, Salmeterol, Placebo Salmeterol, Placebo Tiotropium
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Determinants of exacerbation risk in patients with COPD in the TIOSPIR study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2017
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. COPD from an everyday primary care point of view.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2019
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Claus F VogelmeierDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division for Pulmonary Diseases, Hospital of the University of Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany, claus.vogelmeier@med.uni-marburg.de.
Guus M Asijee
Katrin Kupas
Kai M Beeh
Boehringer Ingelheim (Australia) · AURespiratory Research Institute · DEStatistisches Bundesamt · DEUniversity of Giessen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmong patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the frequency and severity of past exacerbations potentiates future events. The impact of current therapies on exacerbation frequency and severity in patients with different exacerbation risks is not well known.

methodsA post hoc analysis of patients at low (≤1 exacerbation [oral steroids/antibiotics requirement] and no COPD-related hospitalization in the year preceding trial entry) or high (≥2 exacerbations [oral steroids/antibiotics requirement] or ≥1 COPD-related hospitalization[s] in the year preceding trial entry) exacerbation risk, from the Prevention of Exacerbations with Tiotropium in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (POET-COPD(®)) database.

resultsCompared with salmeterol, tiotropium significantly increased time to first COPD exacerbation (hazard ratio 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.92; p = 0.0002) and reduced the number of COPD exacerbations (rate ratio 0.90; 95% CI 0.81-0.99; p = 0.0383) in patients at high exacerbation risk. With treatment, the risk of remaining in the high-risk exacerbator subgroup was statistically lower with tiotropium versus salmeterol (risk ratio [RR] 0.89; 95% CI 0.80-1.00; p = 0.0478). For low-risk patients, time to first COPD exacerbation and number of COPD exacerbations were numerically lower with tiotropium versus salmeterol. With treatment, the risk of transitioning from a low to a high exacerbation risk was lower with tiotropium versus salmeterol (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.71-1.07; p = 0.1968). DISCUSSION: This analysis confirms the higher efficacy of tiotropium versus salmeterol in prolonging time to first COPD exacerbation and reducing number of exacerbations in patients both at low and high exacerbation risk.

fundingBoehringer Ingelheim and Pfizer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00563381.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBronchodilator AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSalmeterol XinafoateScopolamine DerivativesTiotropium BromideAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBronchodilator AgentsSalmeterol XinafoateScopolamine DerivativesTiotropium Bromide

Identifiers

PMID26100349
PMCPMC4487350
OpenAlexW810713411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.