ArticleBrain research2015
Facilitated glutamate release at Schaffer collateral to CA1 synapses has access to an exclusive population of NMDA receptors.
Article in Brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In order to explore short-term facilitation of the Schaffer collateral to CA1 synapse in mouse hippocampal brain slices, we measured the time course of the decay of the peak amplitude of successive EPSCs during progressive MK-801-dependent block (PMDB) of NMDAR responses to paired (R1 and R2) stimuli. We made the unexpected observation that the R2 response exhibited a slower PMDB decay constant than that of the R1 response. This indicated that the facilitated R2 response engages release sites with NMDARs that are protected from opening and consequent MK-801 block during the basal R1 response. We then utilized conditions that affect synaptic glutamate distribution to dissect the components of the distinct PMDB decay constants of the first and second of paired pulses. While extra-synaptic NMDARs and glutamate transporters appear to play only minor roles in the differences of the PMDB decay constant, we showed important roles for the R1 response itself and for glutamate diffusion in determining the PMDB decay constant of R2. We used a simple computational model with realistic parameters that allowed us to predict the time course of R2 decay based on the R1 decay time course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.