Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26099748›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2015

One-point carotid wave intensity predicts cardiac mortality in patients with congestive heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

Olga Vriz, Marco Pellegrinet, Concetta Zito, Vitantonio di Bello, Manola Bettio, Scipione Carerj, Antonello Cittadini, Eduardo Bossone, Francesco Antonini-Canterin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of arterial wave intensity analysis by pressure-velocity and diameter-velocity methods in a virtual population of adult subjects.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Olga VrizCardiology and Emergency Department, Sant'Antonio Hospital, Via Trento-Trieste, 33038, San Daniele del Friuli, Udine, Italy. olgavriz@yahoo.com.
Marco PellegrinetCardiology, ARC, S. Maria degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone, Italy.
Concetta ZitoInstitute of Cardiology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Vitantonio di BelloCardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Manola BettioCardiology and Emergency Department, Sant'Antonio Hospital, Via Trento-Trieste, 33038, San Daniele del Friuli, Udine, Italy.
Scipione CarerjInstitute of Cardiology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Antonello CittadiniDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Eduardo BossoneDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Francesco Antonini-CanterinCardiology, ARC, S. Maria degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wave intensity (WI) is a hemodynamic index used to evaluate the interaction between the heart and the arterial system, measured with an echo-Doppler system at the level of the common carotid artery. WI has two peaks: W1 during early systole that represents left ventricular (LV) contractility, and W2 in late systole that is related to the inertia force during isovolumetric relaxation. The aim of this study was to determine whether WI parameters improve the prediction of poor outcome in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Sixty-two patients (mean age 69.4 ± 11.5 years) in NYHA class II-III were followed up for 43.5 months. They underwent routine clinical work-up, transthoracic echocardiography and WI measurement. A stratified survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. During follow-up, 23 patients died from cardiovascular causes. Survivors and non-survivors were similar in age, blood pressure, heart rate and echocardiographic parameters, except for LV end-diastolic volume indexed to body surface area, E/A ratio (higher in non-survivors) and deceleration time (lower in non-survivors). W2 (1950 ± 1006 vs 1117 ± 708 mmHg m/s(3), p = 0.001) was significantly lower in non-survivors, whereas W1 (6951 ± 4119 vs 5748 ± 3891 mmHg m/s(3), p = NS) was similar. At the end of follow-up, cardiovascular mortality was higher in patients with W1 ≤ 3900 mmHg m/s(3) (p = 0.02) and W2 ≤ 1000 mmHg m/s(3) (p = 0.0002). Only E/A (cut-off 1.5) was predictive of mortality (p = 0.05). In patients with HFrEF, WI parameters derived from the carotid artery better identified patients with poor prognosis and were significant predictors of cardiovascular mortality.

Indexed as

Echocardiography, DopplerStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftAgedAged, 80 and overCarotid Artery, CommonFemaleHeart FailureHemodynamicsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisCardiovascular mortalityEjection fractionHeart failureWave intensity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.