Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26099745›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2015

Real-Life Use and Effectiveness of Adjuvant Trastuzumab in Early Breast Cancer Patients: A Study of the Southeast Netherlands Breast Cancer Consortium.

Shanly C Seferina, Dorien J A Lobbezoo, Maaike de Boer, M Wouter Dercksen, Franchette van den Berkmortel, Roel J W van Kampen, Agnès J van de Wouw, Bart de Vries, Manuela A Joore, Petronella G M Peer and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shanly C SeferinaDepartments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dorien J A LobbezooDepartments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Maaike de BoerDepartments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
M Wouter DercksenDepartments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Franchette van den BerkmortelDepartments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Roel J W van KampenDepartments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Agnès J van de WouwDepartments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bart de VriesDepartments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Manuela A JooreDepartments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Petronella G M PeerDepartments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Adri C VoogdDepartments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Vivianne C G Tjan-HeijnenDepartments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands vcg.tjan.heijnen@mumc.nl.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLAtrium Medisch Centrum Parkstad · NLMáxima Medisch Centrum · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLVieCuri Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of drug prescriptions in real life as opposed to strict clinical trial prescription is only rarely assessed, although it is well recognized that incorrect use may harm patients and may have a significant impact on health care resources. We investigated the use and effectiveness of adjuvant trastuzumab in daily practice compared with the effectiveness in clinical trials.

methodsWe included all patients with stage I-III invasive breast cancer, irrespective of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, diagnosed in five hospitals in the southeast of The Netherlands in 2005-2007. We aimed to assess the actual use of adjuvant trastuzumab in early HER2-positive breast and its efficacy in daily practice.

resultsOf 2,684 patients included, 476 (17.7%) had a HER2-positive tumor. Of these, 251 (52.7%) patients had an indication for trastuzumab treatment of which 196 (78.1%) patients actually received it. Of the 225 patients without an indication, 34 (15.1%) received trastuzumab. Five-year disease-free survival was 80.7% for (n = 230) patients treated with versus 68.2% for (n = 246) patients not treated with trastuzumab (p = .0023), and 5-year overall survival rates were 90.7% and 77.4%, respectively (p = .0002). The hazard ratio for disease recurrence was 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.06) for trastuzumab when adjusting for potential confounders.

conclusionThis study shows that in real life, patients treated with trastuzumab in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer had a 5-year disease-free and overall survival comparable to prior randomized trials. For informative decision making, real-life data are of additional value, providing insight on outcome of patients considered ineligible for treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNetherlandsTrastuzumabAntineoplastic AgentsTrastuzumabEarly breast cancerEffectivenessReal lifeTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID26099745
PMCPMC4524770
OpenAlexW2124845354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.