Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26099672›Full record

ReviewPET clinics2015

PET/Computed Tomography in Renal, Bladder, and Testicular Cancer.

Kirsten Bouchelouche, Peter L Choyke

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PET clinics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The role ofCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2019
    Article
  3. Cancers · 2019
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kirsten BoucheloucheDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & PET Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Brendstrupgaardsvej 100, Aarhus DK-8200, Denmark. Electronic address: kirsbouc@rm.dk.
Peter L ChoykeMolecular Imaging Program, Building 10, Room B3B6B9F, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, MD, USA.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Prostate Cancer ImagingZIABC010655 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2025
$49.2M
Prostate Cancer ImagingZ01BC010655 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2005 to 2008
$2.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging plays an important role in the clinical management of cancer patients. Hybrid imaging with PET/computed tomography (CT) is having a broad impact in oncology, and in recent years PET/CT is beginning to have an impact in urooncology. In both bladder and renal cancers, there is a need to study the efficacy of other tracers than F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), particularly tracers with limited renal excretion. Thus, new tracers are being introduced. This review focuses on the clinical role of FDG and other PET agents in renal, bladder, and testicular cancers.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMultimodal ImagingNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsTesticular NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsBladder cancerPET/CTRenal cancerTesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID26099672
PMCPMC4479416
OpenAlexW2156982006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.