Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26099324›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Prediction of promoters and enhancers using multiple DNA methylation-associated features.

Woochang Hwang, Verity F Oliver, Shannath L Merbs, Heng Zhu, Jiang Qian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Improved regulatory element prediction based on tissue-specific local epigenomic signatures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Woochang Hwang
Verity F Oliver
Shannath L Merbs
Heng Zhu
Jiang Qian
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Wilmer Core Grant for Vision ResearchP30EY001765 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Malia Michelle Edwards · 1985 to 2026
$22.1M
Differential Regulatory Networks in Disease: Application to Macular DegenerationR01EY024580 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI QIAN, JIANG · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
Epigenetics-mediated transcription regulation in mammalsR01GM111514 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI QIAN, JIANG, ZHOU, FENGQUAN · 2014 to 2017
$1.4M
Integrative Analyses of Eye Disease Using Genetic and Epigenetic DatasetsR01EY023188 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MERBS, SHANNATH L, QIAN, JIANG · 2014 to 2016
$1.1M
DNA Methylation in Photoreceptor-Specific Gene Expression and Retinal DiseaseR21EY018703 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MERBS, SHANNATH L · 2009 to 2010
$449k
NEI NIH HHS 5P30EY001765NEI NIH HHS R01EY023188NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024580NEI NIH HHS R01EY024580NEI NIH HHS R21EY018703NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111514NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM111514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegulatory regions (e.g. promoters and enhancers) play an essential role in human development and disease. Many computational approaches have been developed to predict the regulatory regions using various genomic features such as sequence motifs and evolutionary conservation. However, these DNA sequence-based approaches do not reflect the tissue-specific nature of the regulatory regions. In this work, we propose to predict regulatory regions using multiple features derived from DNA methylation profile.

resultsWe discovered several interesting features of the methylated CpG (mCpG) sites within regulatory regions. First, a hypomethylation status of CpGs within regulatory regions, compared to the genomic background methylation level, extended out >1000 bp from the center of the regulatory regions, demonstrating a high degree of correlation between the methylation statuses of neighboring mCpG sites. Second, when a regulatory region was inactive, as determined by histone mark differences between cell lines, methylation level of the mCpG site increased from a hypomethylated state to a hypermethylated state, the level of which was even higher than the genomic background. Third, a distinct set of sequence motifs was overrepresented surrounding mCpG sites within regulatory regions. Using 5 types of features derived from DNA methylation profiles, we were able to predict promoters and enhancers using machine-learning approach (support vector machine). The performances for prediction of promoters and enhancers are quite well, showing an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.992 and 0.817, respectively, which is better than that simply based on methylation level, especially for prediction of enhancers.

conclusionsOur study suggests that DNA methylation features of mCpG sites can be used to predict regulatory regions.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEnhancer Elements, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticAlgorithmsCell LineCpG IslandsGenomicsHumansSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID26099324
PMCPMC4474542
OpenAlexW2141816956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.