Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26099290›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2015

[Bleeding complications in bariatric surgery: Prophylaxis and therapy].

H Spieker, A Dietrich

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

H SpiekerBereich Bariatrische Chirurgie, Klinik u. Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- u. Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
A Dietrich

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bariatric surgery is an elective intervention, which is also performed in patients with additional risk factors, e.g. elderly patients over 65 years old, in patients suffering from relevant comorbidities and in patients with a body mass index (BMI) greater than 60 kg/m(2). To reduce the perioperative risks comorbidities require optimal adjustment. Specialized centers have reported complication rates below 1 %. Besides leakage, bleeding is the most common surgical complication in bariatric interventions. Bleeding complications occur in up to 4 % of cases but are much more common in redo surgery. For the management of bleeding, the same general rules apply as those for abdominal surgery and at the end of an operation, all bleeding must be under control. To avoid bleeding, sealing devices are widely used during tissue dissection. Stapler line bleeding is the most common form of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding. Special stapler magazines and stapler line reinforcement materials are available to minimize stapler line bleeding. Such devices result in relevant extra costs; however, they should always be generally available and used in patients with an increased risk of bleeding or an increased intraoperative tendency to bleeding.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBariatric SurgeryComorbidityElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative HemorrhageRisk FactorsSurgical Staplers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.