Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26099289›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2015

[Complications after supra-aortic reconstruction].

T Bürger

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

T BürgerAgaplesion Diakonie-Kliniken Kassel, Herkulesstraße 34, 34119, Kassel, Deutschland, th.buerger@diako-kassel.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical interventions on the supra-aortic vessels are common procedures to avoid cerebral ischemia or arm pain during exercise. The safety and efficacy has been confirmed by clinical studies. Complications are rare but have serious consequences.

objectivesWhat special indications and recommendations are there for the diagnostics and treatment in the perioperative phase?

methodsThe current article is a literature-based review that considers international studies, guidelines and personal experiences.

resultsThere is a broad range of complications. A simple systematic physical examination is often sufficient to give indications of the problem. Confirming clinical apparative examinations are mostly intraoperative angiography or sonography, whereas postoperative procedures include color-coded duplex sonography (FKDS) and angiography computed tomography (angio-CT). Important basic principles and aspects of operative procedures are presented. Evidence-based differences between the treatment options with resulting complications are mostly unknown; therefore, clinical management mostly relies on expert recommendations.

conclusionThere are several modern treatment options for invasive therapy. Despite a decrease in previous complication rates, typical perioperative complications must be considered. The diagnosis and therapy is carried out according to established strategies.

Indexed as

AngiographyArmBrain IschemiaEvidence-Based MedicineGuideline AdherenceHumansIschemiaPostoperative ComplicationsTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonography, Doppler, Color

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.