Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26099288›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2015

[Vocal cord paralysis after thyroid surgery : Current medicolegal aspects of intraoperative neuromonitoring].

H Dralle, R Schneider, K Lorenz, N Thanh Phuong, C Sekulla, A Machens

Abstract readCase ReportsEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

H DralleUniversitätsklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06097, Halle, Deutschland, henning.dralle@uk-halle.de.
R Schneider
K Lorenz
N Thanh Phuong
C Sekulla
A Machens

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has been commercially available for approximately 15 years and is highly predictive in thyroid gland surgery concerning either postoperative vocal fold mobility in the case of an intact signal for muscle action electromyogram (EMG, > 99 % right negative) or vocal fold dysfunction in the case of loss of signal (> 70 % right positive). The use of IONM improves the intraoperative identification of recurrent laryngeal nerve function and due to the high predictive value with respect to the expected vocal cord function the result of IONM has to be integrated into the surgical concept of thyroidectomy. Unilateral loss of function of the recurrent laryngeal nerve cannot be completely avoided despite correct application of IONM; however, bilateral vocal fold palsy can be safely avoided when contralateral surgery is cancelled after a loss of signal occurs during resection of the first side in planned bilateral surgery (alternative strategy). Patients have to be informed preoperatively about the limitations of IONM and potential strategy changes during planned bilateral surgery. Surgeons should apply IONM according to the published current recommendations and by selecting a risk-oriented intraoperative strategy in the case of loss of signal from the recurrent laryngeal nerve.

Indexed as

Intraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringExpert TestimonyFemaleHumansMalpracticeMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsThyroidectomyVocal Cord Paralysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.