ReviewExpert review of clinical immunology2015
Immunomodulatory role of vitamin D in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia.
Review in Expert review of clinical immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation Significantly Affects the Placental Transcriptome.Nutrients · 2023Article
- TNF-Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2022Review
- Serum 25(OH) Vitamin D Levels in Pregnant Women with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Case-Control Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Association between Maternal Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations and the Risk of Preterm Birth in Central Sudan: A Case-Control Study.Nutrients · 2022Article
- The Mechanism of Downregulation of Twist1 Inhibiting Trophoblast Invasion and Aggravating the Development of Preeclampsia.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Plasma Levels of Vitamin A in Early Pregnancy and Correlationship with Hypertensive Disorder.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Vitamin D in Lupus Patients of Childbearing Age: Are We Doing Enough?Frontiers in reproductive health · 2022Review
- Vitamin D Metabolites and Binding Protein Predict Preeclampsia in Women with Type 1 Diabetes.Nutrients · 2020Article
- Spring peaks and autumn troughs identified in peripheral inflammatory markers during the peripartum period.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Immunometabolism, pregnancy, and nutrition.Seminars in immunopathology · 2018Review
- Long Non-Coding RNAs Serve as Diagnostic Biomarkers of Preeclampsia and Modulate Migration and Invasiveness of Trophoblast Cells.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Worldwide, preeclampsia is a significant health risk to both pregnant women and their unborn children. Despite scientific advances, the exact pathogenesis of preeclampsia is not yet fully understood. Meanwhile, the incidence of preeclampsia is expected to increase. A series of potential etiologies for preeclampsia has been identified, including endothelial dysfunction, immunological dysregulation and trophoblastic invasion. In this literature review, we have critically reviewed existing literature regarding the research findings that link the role of vitamin D to the pathogenesis and immunoregulation of preeclampsia. The relationship of vitamin D with the suspected etiologies of preeclampsia underscores its clinical potential in the diagnosis and treatment of preeclampsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.