Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26098502›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in infectious diseases2015

Expanding the statistical toolbox: analytic approaches for cohort studies with healthcare-associated infectious outcomes.

Rebecca A Pierce, Justin Lessler, Aaron M Milstone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecca A PierceaDepartment of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health bDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine cDepartment of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Justin Lessler
Aaron M Milstone

Funding

Decreasing Neonatal Staphylococcus aureus Disease Through Parental InterventionR01HS022872 · AHRQ · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MILSTONE, AARON M · 2014 to 2017
$1.9M
Impact of decolonization on MRSA transmission in neonatesR03AI117169 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MILSTONE, AARON M · 2015 to 2016
$175k
AHRQ HHS R01HS02287AHRQ HHS R01 HS022872NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI117169NIAID NIH HHS R03AI117169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHealthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a leading cause of adverse patient outcomes. Further elucidation of the etiology of these infections and the pathogens that cause them has been a primary goal of research in infection control and healthcare epidemiology. Longitudinal studies, in particular, afford a range of statistical methods to better understand the process of pathogen acquisition or HAI development. This review intends to convey the scope of available statistical methodology. RECENT

findingsDespite the range of methods available, logistic regression remains the dominant statistical approach in use. Poisson regression, survival methods, and mechanistic (mathematical) models remain underutilized. Recent studies that use these approaches are looking beyond associations to answer questions about the timing, duration, and mechanism of infectious risk. SUMMARY: Logistic regression remains an important approach to the study of HAIs, but in the context of cohort studies, it is most appropriate for short observation periods, during which mechanism is not of primary interest. Additional statistical methodologies are available to build upon risk factor analysis to better inform the process of risk and infection in the hospital setting.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic MethodsHealth FacilitiesBiostatisticsCross InfectionHumansLongitudinal StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26098502
PMCPMC4522157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.