ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene2015
The Scientific Basis of Uncertainty Factors Used in Setting Occupational Exposure Limits.
Article in Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Considerations for establishing occupational exposure limits for small molecule kinase inhibitors in drug development.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Pooled it
- The Scientific Basis for Occupational Exposure Limits for Hydrogen Sulphide-A Critical Commentary.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Trifloxystrobin-Induced Neurotoxicity in Wistar Rats: Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress, Cholinergic Dysfunction, and DNA Damage.Neurotoxicity research · 2026Article
- Who Actually Dies from Indoor Air Pollution? A Forensic Perspective.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Severity of effect considerations regarding the use of mutation as a toxicological endpoint for risk assessment: A report from the 8th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT).Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2025Review
- Requirements for occupational exposure limits in psychosocial risk assessment: What we know, what we don't know and what we can learn from other disciplines.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2025Review
- Comparative review of human health reference values of the United States.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025Review
- Framework for classifying chemicals for repeat dose toxicity using NAMs.Archives of toxicology · 2025Article
- Human health risk assessment of toxic metals in Nass smokeless tobacco in Iran.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Quantitative cross-species comparison of serum albumin binding of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from five structural classes.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024Article
- Adverse effects in traditional and alternative toxicity tests.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2024Article
- Establishing a health-based recommended occupational exposure limit for isoflurane using experimental animal data: a systematic review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2023Article
- G × E interactions as a basis for toxicological uncertainty.Archives of toxicology · 2023Article
- Strategies for refinement of occupational inhalation exposure evaluation in the EPA TSCA risk evaluation process.Toxicology and industrial health · 2023Review
- A scoping review of evaluations of and recommendations for default uncertainty factors in human health risk assessment.Journal of applied toxicology : JAT · 2023Article
- A First-Tier Framework for Assessing Toxicological Risk from Vaporized Cannabis Concentrates.Toxics · 2022Article
- Developing an internal threshold of toxicological concern (iTTC).Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2022Article
- Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2022Article
- Toxicological Effects of Technical Xylene Mixtures on the Female Reproductive System: A Systematic Review.Toxics · 2022Review
- Distributions for time, interspecies and intraspecies extrapolation for deriving occupational exposure limits.Journal of applied toxicology : JAT · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The uncertainty factor concept is integrated into health risk assessments for all aspects of public health practice, including by most organizations that derive occupational exposure limits. The use of uncertainty factors is predicated on the assumption that a sufficient reduction in exposure from those at the boundary for the onset of adverse effects will yield a safe exposure level for at least the great majority of the exposed population, including vulnerable subgroups. There are differences in the application of the uncertainty factor approach among groups that conduct occupational assessments; however, there are common areas of uncertainty which are considered by all or nearly all occupational exposure limit-setting organizations. Five key uncertainties that are often examined include interspecies variability in response when extrapolating from animal studies to humans, response variability in humans, uncertainty in estimating a no-effect level from a dose where effects were observed, extrapolation from shorter duration studies to a full life-time exposure, and other insufficiencies in the overall health effects database indicating that the most sensitive adverse effect may not have been evaluated. In addition, a modifying factor is used by some organizations to account for other remaining uncertainties-typically related to exposure scenarios or accounting for the interplay among the five areas noted above. Consideration of uncertainties in occupational exposure limit derivation is a systematic process whereby the factors applied are not arbitrary, although they are mathematically imprecise. As the scientific basis for uncertainty factor application has improved, default uncertainty factors are now used only in the absence of chemical-specific data, and the trend is to replace them with chemical-specific adjustment factors whenever possible. The increased application of scientific data in the development of uncertainty factors for individual chemicals also has the benefit of increasing the transparency of occupational exposure limit derivation. Improved characterization of the scientific basis for uncertainty factors has led to increasing rigor and transparency in their application as part of the overall occupational exposure limit derivation process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.