Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26097846›Full record

ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2015

Ethical considerations in sex selection.

Tasnim Eghbal Eftekhaari, Abdol Azim Nejatizadeh, Minoo Rajaei, Saeede Soleimanian, Soghra Fallahi, Rahman Ghaffarzadegan, Forough Mahmoudi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tasnim Eghbal EftekhaariMolecular Medicine Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Abdol Azim NejatizadehMolecular Medicine Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Minoo RajaeiFertility and Infertility Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Saeede SoleimanianMolecular Medicine Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Soghra FallahiMolecular Medicine Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Rahman GhaffarzadeganStudent Research Committee, Department of Research and Technology, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Forough MahmoudiFertility and Infertility Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in modern medicine are resulted from unrestricted and unlimited research disregarding many essentials of a research including ethical issues. Following ethical issues, many of unwanted pregnancies and abortions can be avoided. Several factors such as medical issues including X linked disease, has encouraged couples to select traditional or modern techniques in selecting the gender of their children. Some of these methods are corrected Swim-up method or washing of spermatozoa, Percoll gradient sperm separation method, grass wool column filter method method, albumin separation method, microsort method using FISH (Fluorescence in situ hybridization), free electrophoresis method, Ph adjustment method, pre implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)/fluorescence in situ hybridization. This technology is confronted with many ethical issues. Ethical considerations PGD in the SEX SELECTION differ in different religions and their perspectives on this issue. In this this review, electronic databases, books and Internet sites were completely searched and full articles including required keywords and techniques were obtained and reviewed. The rites and religions, were different and had legal perspectives and opinions about PGD. In some non-Islamic countries there are strict rules to control the use of technology. Some of these methods are costly and even risky. They also involve ethical issues such as legitimacy of the conceived fetus; recommending final touches in sex selection is still considered a taboo and a big issue in some cultures or mono-sexual families. Islamic views and beliefs are more flexible and the use of these technologies are allowed to preserve the health and lives permit. Islam strongly favors humanity and supports different issues if they are not in conflict with the primary concept of legitimate reproduction and are beneficial to human beings.

Indexed as

Disadvantages of sex selection methodethicsIslam view

Identifiers

PMID26097846
PMCPMC4456876
OpenAlexW1680871637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.