Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26097701›Full record

ArticleJournal of nutritional science2015

Prevalence of nutritional risk in the non-demented hospitalised elderly: a cross-sectional study from Norway using stratified sampling.

Helene K Eide, Jūratė Šaltytė Benth, Kjersti Sortland, Kristin Halvorsen, Kari Almendingen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nutritional science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Helene K EideDivision of Medicine , Akershus University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine , University of Oslo , Lørenskog , Norway ; Department for Health, Nutrition and Management , Faculty of Health Sciences , Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences , Oslo , Norway.
Jūratė Šaltytė BenthInstitute of Clinical Medicine , Campus Ahus , University of Oslo and HØKH , Research Centre , Akershus University Hospital , Lørenskog , Norway.
Kjersti SortlandDepartment for Health, Nutrition and Management , Faculty of Health Sciences , Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences , Oslo , Norway.
Kristin HalvorsenDepartment for Health, Nutrition and Management , Faculty of Health Sciences , Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences , Oslo , Norway.
Kari AlmendingenDepartment for Health, Nutrition and Management , Faculty of Health Sciences , Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences , Oslo , Norway.
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOAkershus University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a lack of accurate prevalence data on undernutrition and the risk of undernutrition among the hospitalised elderly in Europe and Norway. We aimed at estimating the prevalence of nutritional risk by using stratified sampling along with adequate power calculations. A cross-sectional study was carried out in the period 2011 to 2013 at a university hospital in Norway. Second-year nursing students in acute care clinical studies in twenty hospital wards screened non-demented elderly patients for nutritional risk, by employing the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002) form. In total, 508 patients (48·8 % women and 51·2 % men) with a mean age of 79·6 (sd 6·4) years were screened by the students. Mean BMI was 24·9 (sd 4·9) kg/m(2), and the patients had been hospitalised for on average 5·3 (sd 6·3) d. WHO's BMI cut-off values identified 6·5 % as underweight, 48·0 % of normal weight and 45·5 % as overweight. Patients nutritionally at risk had been in hospital longer and had lower average weight and BMI compared with those not at risk (all P < 0·001); no differences in mean age or sex were observed. The prevalence of nutritional risk was estimated to be 45·4 (95 % CI 41·7 %, 49·0) %, ranging between 20·0 and 65·0 % on different hospital wards. The present results show that the prevalence of nutritional risk among elderly patients without dementia is high, suggesting that a large proportion of the hospitalised elderly are in need of nutritional treatment.

Indexed as

Cross-sectional studiesElderlyHospital practiceNRS2002, Nutritional Risk Screening 2002Nutritional riskS1, student 1S2, student 2Stratified sampling

Identifiers

PMID26097701
PMCPMC4462759
OpenAlexW1962598260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.