Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26097039›Full record

Trial reportArthritis care & research2015

Maintenance of Clinical Efficacy and Radiographic Benefit Through Two Years of Ustekinumab Therapy in Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Results From a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial.

Arthur Kavanaugh, Lluís Puig, Alice B Gottlieb, Christopher Ritchlin, Shu Li, Yuhua Wang, Alan M Mendelsohn, Michael Song, Yaowei Zhu, Proton Rahman and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis care & research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Infections in psoriatic arthritis: association with treatment.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Consensus on targeted drug therapy for spondyloarthritis.Rheumatology and immunology research · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Arthur KavanaughUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Lluís PuigUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alice B GottliebTufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christopher RitchlinUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Shu LiJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
Yuhua WangJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
Alan M MendelsohnJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
Michael SongJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
Yaowei ZhuJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
Proton RahmanMemorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Iain B McInnesUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
PSUMMIT 1 Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab through 2 years in adult patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

methodsA total of 615 adult patients with active PsA were randomized to placebo, ustekinumab 45 mg, or ustekinumab 90 mg, at weeks 0, 4, and every 12 weeks through week 88 (last dose). At week 16, patients with <5% improvement in both tender and swollen joint counts entered blinded early escape (placebo to 45 mg, 45 mg to 90 mg, and 90 mg to 90 mg). All remaining placebo patients crossed over to ustekinumab 45 mg at week 24. Clinical efficacy measures included American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the C-reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP), and ≥75% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75). Radiographic progression was evaluated using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS).

resultsAt week 100, ACR20, DAS28-CRP moderate/good response, and PASI75 rates ranged from 56.7-63.6%, 71.9-76.7%, and 63.9-72.5%, respectively, across the 3 treatment groups. In both ustekinumab groups, the median percent improvement in dactylitis and enthesitis was 100% at week 100. The mean changes in SHS score from week 52 to week 100 were similar to those observed from week 0 to week 52 in the ustekinumab groups. Through week 108, 70.7% and 9.7% of patients had an adverse event (AE) or serious AE, respectively. The rates and type of AEs were similar between the dose groups.

conclusionClinical and radiographic benefits from ustekinumab treatment were maintained through week 100 in the PSUMMIT 1 study. No unexpected safety events were observed; the safety profile of ustekinumab in this population was similar to that previously observed in psoriasis patients treated with ustekinumab.

Indexed as

Arthritis, PsoriaticArthrographyBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinCross-Over StudiesDisability EvaluationDouble-Blind MethodEuropeHumansInflammation MediatorsJointsNorth AmericaRemission InductionSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinInflammation MediatorsUstekinumab

Identifiers

PMID26097039
PMCPMC5063124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.