Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26096991›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

GONAD: Genome-editing via Oviductal Nucleic Acids Delivery system: a novel microinjection independent genome engineering method in mice.

Gou Takahashi, Channabasavaiah B Gurumurthy, Kenta Wada, Hiromi Miura, Masahiro Sato, Masato Ohtsuka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Overview of Delivery Methods for Gene Editing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome Editing in Mouse Embryo Using the CRISPR/Cas12i3 System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Recent Advances in In Vivo Somatic Cell Gene Modification in Newborn Pups.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Perspectives in Genome-Editing Techniques for Livestock.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Efficient Genome Editing of Mice by CRISPR Electroporation of Zygotes.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gou Takahashi1] Department of Molecular Life Science, Division of Basic Medical Science and Molecular Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan [2] Department of Bioproduction, Tokyo University of Agriculture, 196 Yasaka, Abashiri, Hokkaido, 099-2493, Japan.
Channabasavaiah B GurumurthyMouse Genome Engineering Core Facility, Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
Kenta WadaDepartment of Bioproduction, Tokyo University of Agriculture, 196 Yasaka, Abashiri, Hokkaido, 099-2493, Japan.
Hiromi MiuraDepartment of Molecular Life Science, Division of Basic Medical Science and Molecular Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.
Masahiro SatoSection of Gene Expression Regulation, Frontier Science Research Center, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, Kagoshima 890-8544, Japan.
Masato OhtsukaDepartment of Molecular Life Science, Division of Basic Medical Science and Molecular Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.
Tokai University · JPKagoshima University · JPTokyo University of Agriculture · JPUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microinjection is considered the gold standard technique for delivery of nucleic acids (NAs; transgenes or genome editing tools such as CRISPR/Cas9 systems) into embryos, for creating genetically modified organisms. It requires sophisticated equipment as well as well-trained and highly skilled personnel to perform the micro-injection technique. Here, we describe a novel and simple microinjection-independent technique, called Genome-editing via Oviductal Nucleic Acids Delivery (GONAD). Using GONAD, we show that NAs (e.g., eGFP mRNA or Cas9 mRNA/sgRNAs) can be effectively delivered to pre-implantation embryos within the intact mouse oviduct by a simple electroporation method, and result in the desired genetic modification in the embryos. Thus GONAD can bypass many complex steps in transgenic technology such as isolation of zygotes, microinjection of NAs into them, and their subsequent transfer to pseudo-pregnant animals. Furthermore, this method can potentially be used for genome editing in species other than mice.

Indexed as

AnimalsClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsElectroporationElongation Factor 2 KinaseEmbryo, MammalianFemaleGene TargetingGenetic EngineeringGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHypoxanthine PhosphoribosyltransferaseMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMicroinjectionsOviductsEef2k protein, mouseElongation Factor 2 Kinaseenhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHypoxanthine PhosphoribosyltransferaseRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID26096991
PMCPMC4476150
OpenAlexW2396047778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.