Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26096914›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2015

Cortical actin regulation modulates vascular contractility and compliance in veins.

Robert J Saphirstein, Yuan Z Gao, Qian Qian Lin, Kathleen G Morgan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Smooth muscle contractile cytoskeleton in health and disease.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Acetylation and Deacetylation of Cytoskeleton-Associated Proteins.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The cellular mechanobiology of aging: from biology to mechanics.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Coronary remodeling and biomechanics: Are we going with the flow in 2020?American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Mechanical Properties of Diseased Veins.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert J SaphirsteinDepartment of Health Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Yuan Z GaoDepartment of Health Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Qian Qian LinDepartment of Health Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Kathleen G MorganDepartment of Health Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston University · US

Funding

Structure-Function of the CytoskeletonP01HL086655 · NHLBI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI MORGAN, KATHLEEN G · 2007 to 2011
$8.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL086655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most cardiovascular research focuses on arterial mechanisms of disease, largely ignoring venous mechanisms. Here we examine ex vivo venous stiffness, spanning tissue to molecular levels, using biomechanics and magnetic microneedle technology, and show for the first time that venous stiffness is regulated by a molecular actin switch within the vascular smooth muscle cell in the wall of the vein. This switch connects the contractile apparatus within the cell to adhesion structures and facilitates stiffening of the vessel wall, regulating blood flow return to the heart. These studies also demonstrate that passive stiffness, the component of total stiffness not attributable to vascular smooth muscle activation, is severalfold lower in venous tissue than in arterial tissue. We show here that the activity of the smooth muscle cells plays a dominant role in determining total venous stiffness and regulating venous return. The literature on arterial mechanics is extensive, but far less is known about mechanisms controlling mechanical properties of veins. We use here a multi-scale approach to identify subcellular sources of venous stiffness. Portal vein tissue displays a severalfold decrease in passive stiffness compared to aortic tissues. The α-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine (PE) increased tissue stress and stiffness, both attenuated by cytochalasin D (CytoD) and PP2, inhibitors of actin polymerization and Src activity, respectively. We quantify, for the first time, cortical cellular stiffness in freshly isolated contractile vascular smooth muscle cells using magnetic microneedle technology. Cortical stiffness is significantly increased by PE and CytoD inhibits this increase but, surprisingly, PP2 does not. No detectable change in focal adhesion size, measured by immunofluorescence of FAK and zyxin, accompanies the PE-induced changes in cortical stiffness. Probing with phospho-specific antibodies confirmed activation of FAK/Src and ERK pathways and caldesmon phosphorylation. Thus, venous tissue stiffness is regulated both at the level of the smooth muscle cell cortex, via cortical actin polymerization, and by downstream smooth muscle effectors of Src/ERK signalling pathways. These findings identify novel potential molecular targets for the modulation of venous capacitance and venous return in health and disease.

Indexed as

ActinsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFerretsFocal AdhesionsIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle, Smooth, VascularMyocytes, Smooth MusclePortal Veinsrc-Family KinasesActinssrc-Family Kinases

Identifiers

PMID26096914
PMCPMC4575578
OpenAlexW1487243251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.