ArticleParasitology research2015
Activity of synthetic chalcones in hamsters experimentally infected with Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis.
Article in Parasitology research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthesis, In Silico and In Vitro Evaluation for Acetylcholinesterase and BACE-1 Inhibitory Activity of SomeMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis: Evaluation of Therapies Association in Experimentally Infected Mice WithJournal of lasers in medical sciences · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the toxicity of synthetic chalcones 1 and 2 in uninfected hamsters and anti-Leishmania activity of synthetic chalcones 1 and 2 in hamsters infected with Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis. For the toxicity test, uninfected animals were treated with chalcones 1 and 2, and clinical and biochemical parameters and histological aspects of the liver and kidneys were assessed. Chalcones 1 and 2 were then intraperitoneally or topically administered (10 mg/kg body weight) three times per week in animals infected with promastigotes of L. (V.) braziliensis. We monitored the thickness of the infected footpads, determined parasitic load, performed histological analysis, and detected apoptosis in situ. The results were analyzed using Student's t test and Mann-Whitney test at a significance level of 5%. Neither of the chalcones showed toxicity. Chalcone 2 administered intraperitoneally significantly reduced the thickness of the infected footpad compared with the beginning of treatment. The parasite load of the lymph node and spleen was reduced in the groups treated with chalcones 1 (topical) and 2 (intraperitoneal). Chalcone 2 (topical) reduced parasite burden only in the lymph node. The histological analysis revealed reconstitution of the tissue and reductions of inflammation and apoptosis in the infected footpad in these groups. The synthetic chalcones 1 (topical) and 2 (intraperitoneal and topical) at a dose of 10 mg/kg showed anti-Leishmania activity in vivo, no renal or hepatic toxicity, and a reduction of apoptosis of the cells in the lesions. These chalcones may have substantial potential for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.