Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26095234›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2015

Optimizing pharmacokinetic bridging studies in paediatric oncology using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling: application to docetaxel.

Hoai-Thu Thai, Florent Mazuir, Sylvaine Cartot-Cotton, Christine Veyrat-Follet

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A PBPK model recapitulates early kinetics of anti-PEG antibody-mediated clearance of PEG-liposomes.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hoai-Thu ThaiDrug Disposition, Disposition Safety and Animal Research Department, Sanofi, Alfortville, Paris, France.
Florent MazuirDrug Disposition, Disposition Safety and Animal Research Department, Sanofi, Alfortville, Paris, France.
Sylvaine Cartot-CottonDrug Disposition, Disposition Safety and Animal Research Department, Sanofi, Alfortville, Paris, France.
Christine Veyrat-FolletDrug Disposition, Disposition Safety and Animal Research Department, Sanofi, Alfortville, Paris, France.
Sanofi (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimApplying physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling in paediatric cancer drug development is still challenging. We aimed to demonstrate how PBPK modelling can be applied to optimize dose and sampling times for a paediatric pharmacokinetic (PK) bridging study in oncology and to compare with the allometric scaling population PK (AS-popPK) approach, using docetaxel as an example.

methodsA PBPK model for docetaxel was first developed for adult cancer patients using Simcyp® and subsequently used to predict its PK profiles in children by accounting for age-dependent physiological differences. Dose (mg m(-2) ) requirements for children aged 0-18 years were calculated to achieve targeted exposure in adults. Simulated data were then analyzed using population PK modelling with MONOLIX® in order to perform design optimization with the population Fisher information matrix (PFIM). In parallel, the AS-popPK approach was performed for the comparison.

resultsThe PBPK model developed for docetaxel adequately predicted its PK profiles in both adult and paediatric cancer patients (predicted clearance and volume of distribution within 1.5 fold of observed data). The revised dose of docetaxel for a child over 1.5 years old was higher than the adult dose. Considering clinical constraints, the optimal design contained two groups of 15 patients, having three or four sampling times and had good predicted relative standard errors (RSE<30%) for almost all parameters. The AS-popPK approach performed reasonably well but could not predict for very young children.

conclusionThis research shows the clinical utility of PBPK modelling in combination with population PK modelling and optimal design to support paediatric oncology development.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsChildChild, PreschoolClinical Trials as TopicComputer SimulationDocetaxelDrug DiscoveryHumansInfantNeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsTaxoidsAntineoplastic AgentsDocetaxelTaxoidsdocetaxeloptimal designpaediatricsphysiologically-based pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID26095234
PMCPMC4574838
OpenAlexW1524646686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.