Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26094679›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2015

Strategies to Build Trust and Recruit African American and Latino Community Residents for Health Research: A Cohort Study.

Ibrahima C Sankaré, Rachelle Bross, Arleen F Brown, Homero E Del Pino, Loretta F Jones, D'Ann M Morris, Courtney Porter, Aziza Lucas-Wright, Roberto Vargas, Nell Forge and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Feasibility of Problem Adaption Therapy in a Diverse, Frail Older Adult Population (PATH-MHS).The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ibrahima C SankaréDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Rachelle BrossHarbor-UCLA Medical Center and Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California, USA.
Arleen F BrownDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Homero E Del PinoDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Loretta F JonesHealthy African American Families, Los Angeles, California, USA.
D'Ann M MorrisLos Angeles Urban League, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Courtney PorterLos Angeles Urban League, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Aziza Lucas-WrightHealthy African American Families, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Roberto VargasDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Nell ForgeCharles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Keith C NorrisDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Katherine L KahnDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
USC/UCLA Center on Biodemography &Population HealthP30AG017265 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JENNIFER A AILSHIRE · 1999 to 2026
$17.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000124NIA NIH HHS 5P30AG017265-13NIA NIH HHS P30 AG017265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study used Community Partnered Participatory Research (CPPR) to address low participation of racial and ethnic minorities in medical research and the lack of trust between underrepresented communities and researchers.

methodsUsing a community and academic partnership in July 2012, residents of a South Los Angeles neighborhood were exposed to research recruitment strategies: referral by word-of-mouth, community agencies, direct marketing, and extant study participants.

resultsAmong 258 community members exposed to recruitment strategies, 79.8% completed the study. Exposed individuals identified their most important method for learning about the study as referral by study participants (39.8%), community agencies (30.6%), word-of-mouth (17.5%), or direct marketing promotion (12.1%). Study completion rates varied by recruitment method: referral by community agencies (88.7%), referral by participants (80.4%), direct marketing promotion (86.2%), word of mouth (64.3%).

conclusionsAlthough African American and Latino communities are often described as difficult to engage in research, we found high levels of research participation and completion when recruitment strategies emerged from the community itself. This suggests recruitment strategies based on CPPR principles represent an important opportunity for addressing health disparities and our high rates of research completion should provide optimism and a road map for next steps.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient SelectionTrustAdvertisingBlack or African AmericanClinical Trials as TopicCohort StudiesCommunity Health ServicesHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesHispanic or LatinoHumansInformation DisseminationLos AngelesMarketing of Health ServicesAfrican AmericanCommunity Partnered Participatory ResearchLatinorecruitmenttranslational sciencetrust

Identifiers

PMID26094679
PMCPMC4626334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.