Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26094574›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of human genetics2015

Meta-analysis for Discovering Rare-Variant Associations: Statistical Methods and Software Programs.

Zheng-Zheng Tang, Dan-Yu Lin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of human genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zheng-Zheng TangDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Dan-Yu LinDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7420, USA. Electronic address: lin@bios.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVIDIAN, MARIE, KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
STATISTICAL METHODS IN CURRENT CANCER RESEARCHR01CA082659 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIN, DANYU · 2000 to 2016
$3.7M
Semiparametric Regression Analysis of Censored DataR37GM047845 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIN, DANYU · 2005 to 2014
$3.3M
Semiparametric Regression Analysis of Censored DataR01GM047845 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIN, DANYU · 1997 to 2018
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NCI NIH HHS P01CA142538NCI NIH HHS R01 CA082659NCI NIH HHS R01CA082659NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM047845NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM047845NIGMS NIH HHS R37GM047845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is heightened interest in using next-generation sequencing technologies to identify rare variants that influence complex human diseases and traits. Meta-analysis is essential to this endeavor because large sample sizes are required for detecting associations with rare variants. In this article, we provide a comprehensive overview of statistical methods for meta-analysis of sequencing studies for discovering rare-variant associations. Specifically, we discuss the calculation of relevant summary statistics from participating studies, the construction of gene-level association tests, the choice of transformation for quantitative traits, the use of fixed-effects versus random-effects models, and the removal of shadow association signals through conditional analysis. We also show that meta-analysis based on properly calculated summary statistics is as powerful as joint analysis of individual-participant data. In addition, we demonstrate the performance of different meta-analysis methods by using both simulated and empirical data. We then compare four major software packages for meta-analysis of rare-variant associations-MASS, RAREMETAL, MetaSKAT, and seqMeta-in terms of the underlying statistical methodology, analysis pipeline, and software interface. Finally, we present PreMeta, a software interface that integrates the four meta-analysis packages and allows a consortium to combine otherwise incompatible summary statistics.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationSoftwareComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalGenetic Association StudiesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansModels, GeneticRare Diseases

Identifiers

PMID26094574
PMCPMC4571037
OpenAlexW1550916401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.