Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26094087›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2015

The morphotype heterogeneity in Cryptococcus neoformans.

Linqi Wang, Xiaorong Lin

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Tracing the evolution and genomic dynamics of mating-type loci inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Dynamics ofCells · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Life Cycle ofAnnual review of microbiology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Geometrical Distribution ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Linqi WangState Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. Electronic address: wanglq@im.ac.cn.
Xiaorong LinDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States. Electronic address: xlin@bio.tamu.edu.
Institute of Microbiology · CNTexas A&M University · US

Funding

The link between dimorphism and virulence in CryptococcusR01AI097599 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI LIN, XIAORONG · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Investigate the multifunctional adhesins in CryptococcusR21AI107138 · NIAID · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI LIN, XIAORONG · 2013 to 2014
$371k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI097599NIAID NIH HHS R01AI097599NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI107138NIAID NIH HHS R21AI107138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many environmental fungi have evolved exceptional abilities to overcome host defenses and to cause systemic infections. However, the evolutionary trajectory that gives rise to the remarkable pathogenic traits of otherwise saprophytic species is poorly understood. Recent studies suggest that social behaviors likely enhance fitness and augment virulence in the ubiquitous fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. In this regard, heterogeneity in morphotypes and the ability to switch morphotype offer flexibility and resilience for this fungus in disparate environmental and host niches. Here, we discuss the tradeoffs of different morphotypes, the complex intercellular communications that coordinate the transitions of diverse morphotypes, and how the resulting heterogeneity in morphotype provides a source of fitness.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalEnvironmental MicrobiologyGene Expression Regulation, FungalCryptococcosisCryptococcus neoformans

Identifiers

PMID26094087
PMCPMC12860970
OpenAlexW755020420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.