Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26094000›Full record

ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2015

Has Athletic Performance Reached its Peak?

Geoffroy Berthelot, Adrien Sedeaud, Adrien Marck, Juliana Antero-Jacquemin, Julien Schipman, Guillaume Saulière, Andy Marc, François-Denis Desgorces, Jean-François Toussaint

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Effects of acute ingestion of caffeinated chewing gum on performance in elite judo athletes.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2021
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Geoffroy BerthelotIRMES (Institut de Recherche bioMédicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport), INSEP, 11 avenue du Tremblay, 75012, Paris, France. geoffroy.berthelot@insep.fr.
Adrien SedeaudIRMES (Institut de Recherche bioMédicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport), INSEP, 11 avenue du Tremblay, 75012, Paris, France.
Adrien MarckIRMES (Institut de Recherche bioMédicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport), INSEP, 11 avenue du Tremblay, 75012, Paris, France.
Juliana Antero-JacqueminIRMES (Institut de Recherche bioMédicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport), INSEP, 11 avenue du Tremblay, 75012, Paris, France.
Julien SchipmanIRMES (Institut de Recherche bioMédicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport), INSEP, 11 avenue du Tremblay, 75012, Paris, France.
Guillaume SaulièreIRMES (Institut de Recherche bioMédicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport), INSEP, 11 avenue du Tremblay, 75012, Paris, France.
Andy MarcIRMES (Institut de Recherche bioMédicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport), INSEP, 11 avenue du Tremblay, 75012, Paris, France.
François-Denis DesgorcesIRMES (Institut de Recherche bioMédicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport), INSEP, 11 avenue du Tremblay, 75012, Paris, France.
Jean-François ToussaintIRMES (Institut de Recherche bioMédicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport), INSEP, 11 avenue du Tremblay, 75012, Paris, France.
Université Paris Cité · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRInstitut National du Sport, de l'Expertise et de la Performance · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRInstitut de Recherche bio-Médicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limits to athletic performance have long been a topic of myth and debate. However, sport performance appears to have reached a state of stagnation in recent years, suggesting that the physical capabilities of humans and other athletic species, such as greyhounds and thoroughbreds, cannot progress indefinitely. Although the ultimate capabilities may be predictable, the exact path for the absolute maximal performance values remains difficult to assess and relies on technical innovations, sport regulation, and other parameters that depend on current societal and economic conditions. The aim of this literature review was to assess the possible plateau of top physical capabilities in various events and detail the historical backgrounds and sociocultural, anthropometrical, and physiological factors influencing the progress and regression of athletic performance. Time series of performances in Olympic disciplines, such as track and field and swimming events, from 1896 to 2012 reveal a major decrease in performance development. Such a saturation effect is simultaneous in greyhound, thoroughbred, and frog performances. The genetic condition, exhaustion of phenotypic pools, economic context, and the depletion of optimal morphological traits contribute to the observed limitation of physical capabilities. Present conditions prevailing, we approach absolute physical limits and endure a continued period of world record scarcity. Optional scenarios for further improvements will mostly depend on sport technology and modification competition rules.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID26094000
PMCPMC4536275
OpenAlexW586839010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.