Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26093917›Full record

Observational studyLancet (London, England)2015

Readmission destination and risk of mortality after major surgery: an observational cohort study.

Benjamin S Brooke, Philip P Goodney, Larry W Kraiss, Daniel J Gottlieb, Matthew H Samore, Samuel R G Finlayson

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Lancet (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Five-Year Hospital Readmission After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the United Kingdom.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Association Among Fragmented Trauma Care, Mortality, and Major Complications: Optimizing Care for the Injured Beyond the Initial Hospitalization.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prehabilitation: tertiary prevention matters.The British journal of surgery · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin S BrookeDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; IDEAS Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: benjamin.brooke@hsc.utah.edu.
Philip P GoodneySection of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Larry W KraissDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Daniel J GottliebThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, NH, USA.
Matthew H SamoreDivision of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; IDEAS Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Samuel R G FinlaysonDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

Technology Diffusion, Health Outcomes, and Healthcare ExpendituresU01AG046830 · NIA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI SKINNER, JONATHAN S · 2013 to 2017
$4.5M
Understanding Variation in Treatment Intensity with Lower Extremity PADK08HL105676 · NHLBI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI GOODNEY, PHILIP P · 2010 to 2014
$700k
Leveraging Health IT to Avoid Unnecessary Asymptomatic Carotid RevascularizationR21HS021581 · AHRQ · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI GOODNEY, PHILIP P · 2013 to 2014
$296k
AHRQ HHS R21 HS021581NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL05676NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL105676NIA NIH HHS U01 AG046830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital readmissions are common after major surgery, although it is unknown whether patients achieve improved outcomes when they are readmitted to, and receive care at, the index hospital where their surgical procedure was done. We examined the association between readmission destination and mortality risk in the USA in Medicare beneficiaries after a range of common operations.

methodsBy use of claims data from Medicare beneficiaries in the USA between Jan 1, 2001, and Nov 15, 2011, we assessed patients who needed hospital readmission within 30 days after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, infrainguinal arterial bypass, aortobifemoral bypass, coronary artery bypass surgery, oesophagectomy, colectomy, pancreatectomy, cholecystectomy, ventral hernia repair, craniotomy, hip replacement, or knee replacement. We used logistic regression models incorporating inverse probability weighting and instrumental variable analysis to measure associations between readmission destination (index vs non-index hospital) and risk of 90 day mortality for patients who underwent surgery who needed hospital readmission.

findings9,440,503 patients underwent one of 12 major operations, and the number of patients readmitted or transferred back to the index hospital where their operation was done varied from 186,336 (65·8%) of 283,131 patients who were readmitted after coronary artery bypass grafting, to 142,142 (83·2%) of 170,789 patients who were readmitted after colectomy. Readmission was more likely to be to the index hospital than to a non-index hospital if the readmission was for a surgical complication (189,384 [23%] of 834,070 patients readmitted to index hospital vs 36,792 [13%] of 276,976 patients readmitted non-index hospital, p<0·0001). Readmission to the index hospital was associated with a 26% lower risk of 90 day mortality than was readmission to a non-index hospital, with inverse probability weighting used to control for selection bias (odds ratio [OR] 0·74, 95% CI 0·66-0·83). This effect was significant (p<0·0001) for all procedures in inverse probability-weighted models, and was largest for patients who were readmitted after pancreatectomy (OR 0·56, 95% CI 0·45-0·69) and aortobifemoral bypass (OR 0·69, 95% CI 0·61-0·77). By use of hospital-level variation among regional index hospital readmission rates as an instrument, instrumental variable analysis showed that the patients with the highest probability of returning to the index hospital had 8% lower risk of mortality (OR 0·92 95% CI 0·91-0·94) than did patients who were less likely to be readmitted to the index hospital.

interpretationIn the USA, patients who are readmitted to hospital after various major operations consistently achieve improved survival if they return to the hospital where their surgery took place. These findings might have important implications for cost-effectiveness-driven regional centralisation of surgical care.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresOrthopedic ProceduresPatient ReadmissionPostoperative ComplicationsRisk AssessmentSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID26093917
PMCPMC4851558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.