Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26093915›Full record

ReviewAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2015

Endophytic actinobacteria of medicinal plants: diversity and bioactivity.

Patrycja Golinska, Magdalena Wypij, Gauravi Agarkar, Dnyaneshwar Rathod, Hanna Dahm, Mahendra Rai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Antimicrobial Activity of Actinobacteria Isolated From Kratom (International journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Isolation and characterization of endophytic actinobacteria associated with Artemisia judaica L. ssp. sahariensis from desert regions in Algeria.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patrycja GolinskaDepartment of Microbiology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87100, Torun, Poland, golinska@umk.pl.
Magdalena Wypij
Gauravi Agarkar
Dnyaneshwar Rathod
Hanna Dahm
Mahendra Rai

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endophytes are the microorganisms that exist inside the plant tissues without having any negative impact on the host plant. Medicinal plants constitute the huge diversity of endophytic actinobacteria of economical importance. These microbes have huge potential to synthesis of numerous novel compounds that can be exploited in pharmaceutical, agricultural and other industries. It is of prime importance to focus the present research on practical utilization of this microbial group in order to find out the solutions to the problems related to health, environment and agriculture. An extensive characterization of diverse population of endophytic actinobacteria associated with medicinal plants can provide a greater insight into the plant-endophyte interactions and evolution of mutualism. In the present review, we have discussed the diversity of endophytic actinobacteria of from medicinal plants their multiple bioactivities.

Indexed as

ActinobacteriaBiodiversityEndophytesPlants, MedicinalSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID26093915
PMCPMC4491368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.