Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26093283›Full record

ReviewPharmacological research2015

Molecular mechanism matters: Benefits of mechanistic computational models for drug development.

Lindsay E Clegg, Feilim Mac Gabhann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacological research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Considerations for anFrontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lindsay E CleggInstitute for Computational Medicine and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States. Electronic address: lwendel2@jhmi.edu.
Feilim Mac GabhannInstitute for Computational Medicine and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States.

Funding

Systems Biology of Angiogenesis in Peripheral Arterial DiseaseR01HL101200 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI POPEL, ALEKSANDER S. · 2010 to 2022
$10.7M
Endothelial cell decisions integrate soluble and matrix-bound VEGF gradientsR00HL093219 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MAC GABHANN, FEILIM C · 2009 to 2011
$746k
NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL093219NHLBI NIH HHS R00HL093219NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL101200NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL101200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Making drug development a more efficient and cost-effective process will have a transformative effect on human health. A key, yet underutilized, tool to aid in this transformation is mechanistic computational modeling. By incorporating decades of hard-won prior knowledge of molecular interactions, cellular signaling, and cellular behavior, mechanistic models can achieve a level of predictiveness that is not feasible using solely empirical characterization of drug pharmacodynamics. These models can integrate diverse types of data from cell culture and animal experiments, including high-throughput systems biology experiments, and translate the results into the context of human disease. This provides a framework for identification of new drug targets, measurable biomarkers for drug action in target tissues, and patient populations for which a drug is likely to be effective or ineffective. Additionally, mechanistic models are valuable in virtual screening of new therapeutic strategies, such as gene or cell therapy and tissue regeneration, identifying the key requirements for these approaches to succeed in a heterogeneous patient population. These capabilities, which are distinct from and complementary to those of existing drug development strategies, demonstrate the opportunity to improve success rates in the drug development pipeline through the use of mechanistic computational models.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAnimalsArrhythmias, CardiacComputer SimulationDrug DesignDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansIschemiaMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsTranslational Research, BiomedicalUser-Computer InterfaceDrug developmentMechanistic computational modelPharmacodynamicsPharmacokineticsSystems pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID26093283
PMCPMC4567444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.