Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26093048›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2015

Distinct effects of ventral tegmental area NMDA and acetylcholine receptor blockade on conditioned reinforcement produced by food-associated cues.

R J Wickham, W B Solecki, E J Nunes, N A Addy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. AlphaFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Neurobiology of reward-related learning.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R J WickhamInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
W B SoleckiInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
E J NunesInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
N A AddyInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, New Haven, CT 06520, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. Electronic address: nii.addy@yale.edu.
Yale University · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING - BIOLOGICAL SCIENCEST32MH014276 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Marina R Picciotto · 1985 to 2026
$7.2M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH014276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stimuli paired with rewards acquire reinforcing properties to promote reward-seeking behavior. Previous work supports the role of ventral tegmental area (VTA) nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in mediating conditioned reinforcement elicited by drug-associated cues. However, it is not known whether these cholinergic mechanisms are specific to drug-associated cues or whether VTA cholinergic mechanisms also underlie the ability of cues paired with natural rewards to act as conditioned reinforcers. Burst firing of VTA dopamine (DA) neurons and the subsequent phasic DA release in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) plays an important role in cue-mediated behavior and in the ability of cues to acquire reinforcing properties. In the VTA, both AChRs and N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) regulate DA burst firing and phasic DA release. Here, we tested the role of VTA nAChRs, muscarinic AChRs (mAChRs), and NMDARs in the conditioned reinforcement elicited by a food-associated, natural reward cue. Subjects received 10 consecutive days of Pavlovian conditioning training where lever extension served as a predictive cue for food availability. On day 11, rats received bilateral VTA infusion of saline, AP-5 (0.1 or 1μg), mecamylamine (MEC: 3 or 30μg) or scopolamine (SCOP: 3 or 66.7μg) immediately prior to the conditioned reinforcement test. During the test, nosepoking into the active (conditioned reinforced, CR) noseport produced a lever cue while nosepoking on the inactive (non-conditioned reinforced, NCR) noseport had no consequence. AP-5 robustly attenuated conditioned reinforcement and blocked discrimination between CR and NCR noseports at the 1-μg dose. MEC infusion decreased responding for both CR and NCR while 66.7-μg SCOP disrupted the subject's ability to discriminate between CR and NCR. Together, our data suggest that VTA NMDARs and mAChRs, but not nAChRs, play a role in the ability of natural reward-associated cues to act as conditioned reinforcers.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalConditioning, OperantCuesDopamineDose-Response Relationship, DrugExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsMaleMecamylamineNicotinic AntagonistsN-MethylaspartateRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, NicotinicReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate2-amino-5-phosphopentanoic acidDopamineExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsMecamylamineNicotinic AntagonistsN-MethylaspartateReceptors, NicotinicReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateScopolamineValineconditioned reinforcementincentive saliencemuscarinic receptornicotinic receptorNMDA receptorventral tegmental area

Identifiers

PMID26093048
PMCPMC4510872
OpenAlexW600102253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.