Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2015
Patient-reported outcomes with adjuvant exemestane versus tamoxifen in premenopausal women with early breast cancer undergoing ovarian suppression (TEXT and SOFT): a combined analysis of two phase 3 randomised trials.
Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 90 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III Trial Evaluating the Role of Ovarian Function Suppression and the Role of Exemestane as Adjuvant Therapies for Premenopausal Women With Endocrine Responsive Breast Cancer
A Phase III Trial Evaluating The Role Of Exemestane Plus GnRH Analogue As Adjuvant Therapy For Premenopausal Women With Endocrine Responsive Breast Cancer
LA LEAST- Luminal A, Limited Endocrine Adjuvant Systemic Therapy. A Trial of Abbreviated Hormone Therapy for Low Risk Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2 Negative Early Breast Cancer
Who cites it
90 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 175 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three-monthly gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for ovarian function suppression in premenopausal breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Pooled it
- Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in premenopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer treated with ovarian suppression: a patient-level meta-analysis of 7030 women from four randomised trials.The Lancet. Oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer 2021.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2021Guideline
- Ovarian suppression for adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Aromatase inhibitors in premenopausal women with breast cancer: the state of the art and future prospects.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2018Pooled it
- Practical recommendations for fertility preservation in women by the FertiPROTEKT network. Part I: Indications for fertility preservation.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2018Guideline
- Informing hot flash treatment decisions for breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of randomized trials comparing active interventions.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2016Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Adjuvant Exemestane With Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Breast Cancer: Long-Term Follow-Up of the Combined TEXT and SOFT Trials.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Trial
- The affect of goserelin on the QoL of women having chemotherapy for EBC: Results from the OPTION trial.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020Trial
- Genetic predictors to acupuncture response for hot flashes: an exploratory study of breast cancer survivors.Menopause (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Trial
- Quality of life under extended continuous versus intermittent adjuvant letrozole in lymph node-positive, early breast cancer patients: the SOLE randomised phase 3 trial.British journal of cancer · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Tailoring Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Premenopausal Breast Cancer.The New England journal of medicine · 2018Trial
- The utility of anti-Müllerian hormone in the diagnosis and prediction of loss of ovarian function following chemotherapy for early breast cancer.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2017Trial
- A pilot randomized trial to prevent sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors starting adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2017Trial
- Adjuvant Tamoxifen Plus Ovarian Function Suppression Versus Tamoxifen Alone in Premenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer: Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016Trial
- Austrian treatment algorithms 2025: CDK 4/6 inhibitors in the adjuvant therapy of HR+/HER2- early breast cancer.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Review
- PANTHERA "Pelvic Floor Disorders in Patients Under ANtineoplastic THERApy" Prospective Evaluation of Subjectively Perceived Pelvic Floor Function in Patients with Gynecologic and Breast Cancers Undergoing Systemic Antineoplastic Therapy Using a Validated Pelvic Floor Questionnaire.International urogynecology journal · 2026Observational
30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors at 14 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe combined efficacy analysis of the TEXT and SOFT trials showed a significant disease-free survival benefit with exemestane plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) compared with tamoxifen plus OFS. We present patient-reported outcomes from these trials.
methodsBetween Nov 7, 2003, and April 7, 2011, 4717 premenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer were enrolled in TEXT or SOFT to receive unmasked adjuvant treatment with 5 years of exemestane plus OFS or tamoxifen plus OFS. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue triptorelin, bilateral oophorectomy, or bilateral ovarian irradiation were used to achieve OFS. Chemotherapy use was optional. Randomisation with permuted blocks was done with the International Breast Cancer Study Group's internet-based system and was stratified by chemotherapy use and status of lymph nodes. Patients completed a quality of life (QoL) form comprising several global and symptom indicators at baseline, every 6 months for 24 months, and then every year during years 3 to 6. Differences in the change of QoL from baseline between the two treatments were tested at 6 months, 24 months, and 60 months with mixed-models for repeated measures for each trial with and without chemotherapy and overall. The analysis was by intention to treat. At the time of analysis, the median follow-up was 5·7 years (IQR 3·7-6·9); treatment and follow-up of patients continue. The trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, as NCT00066703 (TEXT) and NCT00066690 (SOFT).
findingsPatients on tamoxifen plus OFS were more affected by hot flushes and sweats over 5 years than were those on exemestane plus OFS, although these symptoms improved. Patients on exemestane plus OFS reported more vaginal dryness, greater loss of sexual interest, and difficulties becoming aroused than did patients on tamoxifen plus OFS; these differences persisted over time. An increase in bone or joint pain was more pronounced, particularly in the short term, in patients on exemestane plus OFS than patients on tamoxifen plus OFS. Changes in global QoL indicators from baseline were small and similar between treatments over the 5 years.
interpretationOverall, from a QoL perspective, there is no strong indication to favour either exemestane plus OFS or tamoxifen plus OFS. The distinct effects of the two treatments on the burden of endocrine symptoms need to be addressed with patients individually.
fundingPfizer, International Breast Cancer Study Group, and US National Cancer Institute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.