Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26092803›Full record

ArticleFungal genetics and biology : FG & B2015

Conditional promoters for analysis of essential genes in Zymoseptoria tritici.

S Kilaru, W Ma, M Schuster, M Courbot, G Steinberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Expression of aFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Cell Biology of Hyphal Growth.Microbiology spectrum · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S KilaruBiosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK. Electronic address: S.Kilaru@exeter.ac.uk.
W MaBiosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
M SchusterBiosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
M CourbotSyngenta Crop Protection AG, Schaffhauserstrasse, 4332 Stein, Switzerland.
G SteinbergBiosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK. Electronic address: G.Steinberg@exeter.ac.uk.
University of Exeter · GBSyngenta (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I020667/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of new fungicides, needed for sustainable control of fungal plant pathogens, requires identification of novel anti-fungal targets. Essential fungal-specific proteins are good candidates, but due to their importance, gene deletion mutants are not viable. Consequently, their cellular role often remains elusive. This hindrance can be overcome by the use of conditional mutants, where expression is controlled by an inducible/repressible promoter. Here, we introduce 5 inducible/repressible promoter systems to study essential genes in the wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici. We fused the gene for enhanced green-fluorescent protein (egfp) to the promoter region of Z. tritici nitrate reductase (Pnar1; induced by nitrogen and repressed by ammonium), 1,4-β-endoxylanase A (Pex1A; induced by xylose and repressed by maltodextrin), l-arabinofuranosidase B (PlaraB; induced by arabinose and repressed by glucose), galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase 7 (Pgal7; induced by galactose and repressed by glucose) and isocitrate lyase (Picl1; induced by sodium acetate and repressed by glucose). This was followed by quantitative analysis of cytoplasmic reporter fluorescence under induced and repressed conditions. We show that Pnar1, PlaraB and Pex1A drive very little or no egfp expression when repressed, but induce moderate protein production when induced. In contrast, Pgal7 and Picl1 show considerable egfp expression when repressed, and were strongly induced in the presence of their inducers. Normalising the expression levels of all promoters to that of the α-tubulin promoter Ptub2 revealed that PlaraB was the weakest promoter (∼20% of Ptub2), whereas Picl1 strongly expressed the reporter (∼250% of Ptub2). The use of these tools promises a better understanding of essential genes, which will help developing novel control strategies that protect wheat from Z. tritici.

Indexed as

Genes, EssentialGenes, FungalPromoter Regions, GeneticArtificial Gene FusionAscomycotaGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, ReporterGenetics, MicrobialGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMolecular BiologyPlant DiseasesTriticumenhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsFungal wheat pathogenInducible–repressible promoterMycosphaerella graminicolaSeptoria tritici blotch

Identifiers

PMID26092803
PMCPMC4502454
OpenAlexW575975196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.