Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26092796›Full record

ArticleFungal genetics and biology : FG & B2015

Exploitation of sulfonylurea resistance marker and non-homologous end joining mutants for functional analysis in Zymoseptoria tritici.

Y S Sidhu, T C Cairns, Y K Chaudhari, J Usher, N J Talbot, D J Studholme, M Csukai, K Haynes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Overexpression ofMicroorganisms · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Y S SidhuBiosciences, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
T C CairnsBiosciences, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Y K ChaudhariBiosciences, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
J UsherBiosciences, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
N J TalbotBiosciences, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
D J StudholmeBiosciences, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
M CsukaiSyngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, Berkshire RG426EY, UK.
K HaynesBiosciences, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK. Electronic address: k.haynes@exeter.ac.uk.
University of Exeter · GBSyngenta (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I025956/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J500793/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of techniques for rapid assembly of gene deletion vectors, paucity of selectable marker genes available for genetic manipulation and low frequency of homologous recombination are major constraints in construction of gene deletion mutants in Zymoseptoria tritici. To address these issues, we have constructed ternary vectors for Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation of Z. tritici, which enable the single step assembly of multiple fragments via yeast recombinational cloning. The sulfonylurea resistance gene, which is a mutated allele of the Magnaporthe oryzae ILV2 gene, was established as a new dominant selectable marker for Z. tritici. To increase the frequency of homologous recombination, we have constructed Z. tritici strains deficient in the non-homologous end joining pathway of DNA double stranded break repair by inactivating the KU70 and KU80 genes. Targeted gene deletion frequency increased to more than 85% in both Z. tritici ku70 and ku80 null strains, compared to ⩽10% seen in the wild type parental strain IPO323. The in vitro growth and in planta pathogenicity of the Z. tritici ku70 and ku80 null strains were comparable to strain IPO323. Together these molecular tools add significantly to the platform available for genomic analysis through targeted gene deletion or promoter replacements and will facilitate large-scale functional characterization projects in Z. tritici.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, FungalGenetic MarkersAgrobacterium tumefaciensAscomycotaGene DeletionGene TargetingGenetic VectorsHomologous RecombinationSelection, GeneticSulfonylurea CompoundsTransformation, GeneticGenetic MarkersSulfonylurea CompoundsAgrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformationGene targeting frequencyHomologous recombinationKu70Ku80Non homologous end joining mutantsSulfonylureaYeast recombinational cloningZymoseptoria tritici

Identifiers

PMID26092796
PMCPMC4502460
OpenAlexW624178658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.