Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26092703›Full record

ArticleComparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP2015

Using Ambystoma mexicanum (Mexican axolotl) embryos, chemical genetics, and microarray analysis to identify signaling pathways associated with tissue regeneration.

Larissa V Ponomareva, Antony Athippozhy, Jon S Thorson, S Randal Voss

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The endocannabinoid system regulates both ependymoglial and neuronal cell responses to a tail amputation in the axolotl.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chemical genetics of regeneration: Contrasting temporal effects of CoClDevelopmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Article
  16. Towards comparative analyses of salamander limb regeneration.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2021
    Review
  17. Salamander Insights Into Ageing and Rejuvenation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  18. HDAC Inhibitor Titration of Transcription and Axolotl Tail Regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. OleD Loki as a Catalyst for Hydroxamate Glycosylation.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Larissa V PonomarevaCollege of Pharmacy and Center for Pharmaceutical Research and Innovation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Antony AthippozhyDepartment of Biology, Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, and Ambystoma Genetic Stock Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
Jon S ThorsonCollege of Pharmacy and Center for Pharmaceutical Research and Innovation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
S Randal VossDepartment of Biology, Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, and Ambystoma Genetic Stock Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA. Electronic address: srvoss@uky.edu.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000117 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$13.3M
Research Resources for Model AmphibiansR24OD010435 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI SMITH, JERAMIAH JAMES, VOSS, STEPHEN RANDAL · 2012 to 2025
$5.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000117NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000117NIH HHS R24 OD010435NIH HHS R24OD010435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amphibian vertebrates are important models in regenerative biology because they present exceptional regenerative capabilities throughout life. However, it takes considerable effort to rear amphibians to juvenile and adult stages for regeneration studies, and the relatively large sizes that frogs and salamanders achieve during development make them difficult to use in chemical screens. Here, we introduce a new tail regeneration model using late stage Mexican axolotl embryos. We show that axolotl embryos completely regenerate amputated tails in 7days before they exhaust their yolk supply and begin to feed. Further, we show that axolotl embryos can be efficiently reared in microtiter plates to achieve moderate throughput screening of soluble chemicals to investigate toxicity and identify molecules that alter regenerative outcome. As proof of principle, we identified integration 1 / wingless (Wnt), transforming growth factor beta (Tgf-β), and fibroblast growth factor (Fgf) pathway antagonists that completely block tail regeneration and additional chemicals that significantly affected tail outgrowth. Furthermore, we used microarray analysis to show that inhibition of Wnt signaling broadly affects transcription of genes associated with Wnt, Fgf, Tgf-β, epidermal growth factor (Egf), Notch, nerve growth factor (Ngf), homeotic gene (Hox), rat sarcoma/mitogen-activated protein kinase (Ras/Mapk), myelocytomatosis viral oncogene (Myc), tumor protein 53 (p53), and retinoic acid (RA) pathways. Punctuated changes in the expression of genes known to regulate vertebrate development were observed; this suggests the tail regeneration transcriptional program is hierarchically structured and temporally ordered. Our study establishes the axolotl as a chemical screening model to investigate signaling pathways associated with tissue regeneration.

Indexed as

Ambystoma mexicanumAnimalsMicroarray AnalysisRegenerationSignal TransductionTranscription, GeneticVertebratesAxolotlC59Chemical screeningRegenerationWnt

Identifiers

PMID26092703
PMCPMC4662883
OpenAlexW649855413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.