Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26092676›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2015

A Bayesian generalized random regression model for estimating heritability using overdispersed count data.

Colette Mair, Michael Stear, Paul Johnson, Matthew Denwood, Joaquin Prada Jimenez de Cisneros, Thorsten Stefan, Louise Matthews

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Colette MairInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Bearsden Road, Glasgow, G611QH, UK. Colette.Mair@glasgow.ac.uk.
Michael StearInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Bearsden Road, Glasgow, G611QH, UK. Michael.Stear@glasgow.ac.uk.
Paul JohnsonInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Bearsden Road, Glasgow, G611QH, UK. Paul.Johnson@glasgow.ac.uk.
Matthew DenwoodSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Bearsden Road, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK. Matthew.Denwood@glasgow.ac.uk.
Joaquin Prada Jimenez de CisnerosInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Bearsden Road, Glasgow, G611QH, UK. Joaquin.Prada@glasgow.ac.uk.
Thorsten StefanInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Bearsden Road, Glasgow, G611QH, UK. Thorsten.Stefan@glasgow.ac.uk.
Louise MatthewsInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Bearsden Road, Glasgow, G611QH, UK. Louise.Matthews@glasgow.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F015313/1Wellcome Trust WT091717MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFaecal egg counts are a common indicator of nematode infection and since it is a heritable trait, it provides a marker for selective breeding. However, since resistance to disease changes as the adaptive immune system develops, quantifying temporal changes in heritability could help improve selective breeding programs. Faecal egg counts can be extremely skewed and difficult to handle statistically. Therefore, previous heritability analyses have log transformed faecal egg counts to estimate heritability on a latent scale. However, such transformations may not always be appropriate. In addition, analyses of faecal egg counts have typically used univariate rather than multivariate analyses such as random regression that are appropriate when traits are correlated. We present a method for estimating the heritability of untransformed faecal egg counts over the grazing season using random regression.

resultsReplicating standard univariate analyses, we showed the dependence of heritability estimates on choice of transformation. Then, using a multitrait model, we exposed temporal correlations, highlighting the need for a random regression approach. Since random regression can sometimes involve the estimation of more parameters than observations or result in computationally intractable problems, we chose to investigate reduced rank random regression. Using standard software (WOMBAT), we discuss the estimation of variance components for log transformed data using both full and reduced rank analyses. Then, we modelled the untransformed data assuming it to be negative binomially distributed and used Metropolis Hastings to fit a generalized reduced rank random regression model with an additive genetic, permanent environmental and maternal effect. These three variance components explained more than 80 % of the total phenotypic variation, whereas the variance components for the log transformed data accounted for considerably less. The heritability, on a link scale, increased from around 0.25 at the beginning of the grazing season to around 0.4 at the end.

conclusionsRandom regressions are a useful tool for quantifying sources of variation across time. Our MCMC (Markov chain Monte Carlo) algorithm provides a flexible approach to fitting random regression models to non-normal data. Here we applied the algorithm to negative binomially distributed faecal egg count data, but this method is readily applicable to other types of overdispersed data.

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait, HeritableAlgorithmsAnimalsBayes TheoremFecesModels, StatisticalParasite Egg CountRegression AnalysisSheepSheep Diseases

Identifiers

PMID26092676
PMCPMC4473853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.