Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26092571›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2015

Differences in intermittent and continuous fecal shedding patterns between natural and experimental Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infections in cattle.

Rebecca M Mitchell, Ynte Schukken, Ad Koets, Maarten Weber, Douwe Bakker, Judy Stabel, Robert H Whitlock, Yoram Louzoun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Longitudinal Study ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Age-structured next generation matrix and RInfectious Disease Modelling · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Pathological Features and Genotyping ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Successful Control ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  8. Stage of infection withFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  9. Genomic epidemiology ofFrontiers in genetics · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Bovine Immunity and Vitamin DMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Serological and Molecular Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebecca M MitchellCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. rmm257@gmail.com.
Ynte SchukkenDepartment of Bacteriology and TSE, Central Veterinary Institute part of Wageningen UR, Lelystad, The Netherlands. yschukken@cornell.edu.
Ad KoetsGD Animal Health, Deventer, The Netherlands. ad.koets@wur.nl.
Maarten WeberGD Animal Health, Deventer, The Netherlands. m.weber@gdanimalhealth.com.
Douwe BakkerCentral Institute for Animal Disease Control, Lelystad, The Netherlands. douwe.bakker@wur.nl.
Judy StabelNational Animal Diseases Center Ames, 2300 Dayton Avenue, Ames, IA, 50010, USA. judy.stabel@ars.usda.gov.
Robert H WhitlockDepartment of Clinical Studies, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. rhw@upenn.edu.
Yoram LouzounGonda Brain Research Center and Department of Mathematics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel. louzouy@math.biu.ac.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to study shedding patterns of cows infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP). While multiple single farm studies of MAP dynamics were reported, there is not large scale meta-analysis of both natural and experimental infections. Large difference in shedding patterns between experimentally and naturally infected cows were observed. Experimental infections are thus probably driven by different pathological mechanisms. For further evaluations of shedding patterns only natural infections were used. Within such infections, the transition to high shedding was studied as a proxy to the development of a clinical disease. The majority of studied cows never developed high shedding levels. Those that do, typically never reduced their shedding level to low or no shedding. Cows that eventually became high shedders showed a pattern of continuous shedding. In contrast, cows with an intermittent shedding pattern had a low probability to ever become high shedders. In addition, cows that start shedding at a younger age (less than three years of age) have a lower hazard of becoming high shedders compared to cows starting to shed at an older age. These data suggest the presence of three categories of immune control. Cows that are intermittent shedders have the infection process under control (no progressive infection). Cows that start shedding persistently at a young age partially control the infection, but eventually will be high shedders (slow progressive infection), while cows that start shedding persistently at an older age cannot effectively control the infection and become high shedders rapidly.

Indexed as

Bacterial SheddingAnimalsBiomarkersCattleCattle DiseasesDairyingEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFecesLongitudinal StudiesMycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosisNetherlandsParatuberculosisUnited StatesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID26092571
PMCPMC4474556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.