Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26092566›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2015

Technology, cognition and error.

Enrico Coiera

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Automation bias and verification complexity: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Risks and benefits of speech recognition for clinical documentation: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Understanding Human Over-Reliance On Technology.P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Automation bias in electronic prescribing.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. EHR-related medication errors in two ICUs.Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management · 2017
    Article
  18. A New Informatics Geography.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Enrico Coiera

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive biasesComplexityHuman factorsInformation technologyInterruptions

Identifiers

PMID26092566
PMCPMC4484254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.