Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26092528›Full record

ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2015

A Drosophila model to investigate the neurotoxic side effects of radiation exposure.

Lisa J Sudmeier, Steven P Howard, Barry Ganetzky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Medical science pulse · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Prophylactically Feeding Manganese toAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. DNA repair in tumor radioresistance: insights from fruit flies genetics.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ionizing radiation alters functional neurotransmission inFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effects of blunt force injuries in third-instarmicroPublication biology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa J SudmeierLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 425 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Steven P HowardDepartment of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792, USA.
Barry GanetzkyLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 425 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706, USA ganetzky@wisc.edu.

Funding

INTEGRATED TRAINING FOR PHYSICIAN-SCIENTISTST32GM008692 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURKARD, MARK E · 1998 to 2020
$10.3M
Biology of Aging and Age-Related Diseases Training GrantT32AG000213 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Rozalyn M. Anderson, Sanjay Asthana · 1991 to 2026
$9.9M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000213NIA NIH HHS T32AG000213NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008692NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM008692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children undergoing cranial radiation therapy (CRT) for pediatric central nervous system malignancies are at increased risk for neurological deficits later in life. We have developed a model of neurotoxic damage in adult Drosophila following irradiation during the juvenile stages with the goal of elucidating underlying neuropathological mechanisms and of ultimately identifying potential therapeutic targets. Wild-type third-instar larvae were irradiated with single doses of γ-radiation, and the percentage that survived to adulthood was determined. Motor function of surviving adults was examined with a climbing assay, and longevity was assessed by measuring lifespan. Neuronal cell death was assayed by using immunohistochemistry in adult brains. We also tested the sensitivity at different developmental stages by irradiating larvae at various time points. Irradiating late third-instar larvae at a dose of 20 Gy or higher impaired the motor activity of surviving adults. A dose of 40 Gy or higher resulted in a precipitous reduction in the percentage of larvae that survive to adulthood. A dose-dependent decrease in adult longevity was paralleled by a dose-dependent increase in activated Death caspase-1 (Dcp1) in adult brains. Survival to adulthood and adult lifespan were more severely impaired with decreasing larval age at the time of irradiation. Our initial survey of the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel demonstrated that differences in genotype can confer phenotypic differences in radio-sensitivity for developmental survival and motor function. This work demonstrates the usefulness of Drosophila to model the toxic effects of radiation during development, and has the potential to unravel underlying mechanisms and to facilitate the discovery of novel therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrainCell DeathChildDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGamma RaysHumansLarvaLongevityMaleModels, AnimalRadiation Injuries, ExperimentalRadiation ProtectionRadiation ToleranceCell deathGene association studiesNeuropathologyRadiosensitivity

Identifiers

PMID26092528
PMCPMC4486860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.