ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2015
The effectiveness of the waffle-cone technique in treating complex intracranial aneurysms.
Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Management of Intracranial Aneurysms: Current Trends and Future Directions.Neurology international · 2024Review
- [Brain aneurysms treatment with pCONus2 device. Initial experience at IMSS].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023Article
- The Application of "Stilted Building" Technique in the Embolization of Aneurysms with Secondary Branches.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Re-treatment of an unruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm using the new pCONus 2 device: Description of a case.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report 13 consecutive cases of complex intracranial aneurysms treated by the waffle-cone technique and the midterm angiographic results and discuss the effectiveness and safety of this technique. We performed a retrospective review to evaluating the angiographic results and clinical effectiveness of 15 cases in which waffle-cone stenting for treating broad-necked complex intracranial aneurysms at our institution up to July 2008. Among these 15 patients, we enrolled 13 patients who had undergone at least one follow-up angiography. We collected patient data including age, sex, ruptured state, aneurysm size, neck size, complications, initial Hunt and Hess (HH) grade, modified Rankin Score (mRS) at the last angiographic follow-up, and initial and follow- up angiographic results.The mean size of the aneurysm was 10.6 mm (range, 4.0 to 20.4 mm) and the mean size of the aneurysm neck was 5.7 mm (range, 2.7 to 9.2 mm). The mean angiographic follow-up time was 13.6 months (range, six to 30 months). There were no procedure-related complications. However, there were two delayed complications. One complication was delayed focal embolic infarct and the other complication was delayed rebleeding. Angiographic improvement was achieved in two cases (15.4%), stable occlusion was achieved in seven cases (53.8%), and recanalization or compaction that needed retreatment occurred in four cases (30.8%). We think that the waffle-cone technique is an effective alternative in selected aneurysms unable to be "Y" stented or surgically clipped.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.