Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26092220›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2015

Feel the Noise: Relating Individual Differences in Auditory Imagery to the Structure and Function of Sensorimotor Systems.

César F Lima, Nadine Lavan, Samuel Evans, Zarinah Agnew, Andrea R Halpern, Pradheep Shanmugalingam, Sophie Meekings, Dana Boebinger, Markus Ostarek, Carolyn McGettigan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effects of vocal-motor interference on vocal pitch imitation.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Auditory imagery ability influences accuracy when singing with altered auditory feedback.Musicae scientiae : the journal of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Music of Silence: Part I: Responses to Musical Imagery Encode Melodic Expectations and Acoustics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  13. Hallucinations as intensified forms of mind-wandering.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. An Exploratory Study of Imagining Sounds and "Hearing" Music in Autism.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

César F LimaInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience Center for Psychology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Nadine LavanInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, London, UK.
Samuel EvansInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience.
Zarinah AgnewInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience Department of Otolaryngology, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Andrea R HalpernDepartment of Psychology, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, USA.
Pradheep ShanmugalingamInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience.
Sophie MeekingsInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience.
Dana BoebingerInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience.
Markus OstarekInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience.
Carolyn McGettiganInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, London, UK.
Jane E WarrenFaculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Sophie K ScottInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 090961Wellcome Trust WT090961MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans can generate mental auditory images of voices or songs, sometimes perceiving them almost as vividly as perceptual experiences. The functional networks supporting auditory imagery have been described, but less is known about the systems associated with interindividual differences in auditory imagery. Combining voxel-based morphometry and fMRI, we examined the structural basis of interindividual differences in how auditory images are subjectively perceived, and explored associations between auditory imagery, sensory-based processing, and visual imagery. Vividness of auditory imagery correlated with gray matter volume in the supplementary motor area (SMA), parietal cortex, medial superior frontal gyrus, and middle frontal gyrus. An analysis of functional responses to different types of human vocalizations revealed that the SMA and parietal sites that predict imagery are also modulated by sound type. Using representational similarity analysis, we found that higher representational specificity of heard sounds in SMA predicts vividness of imagery, indicating a mechanistic link between sensory- and imagery-based processing in sensorimotor cortex. Vividness of imagery in the visual domain also correlated with SMA structure, and with auditory imagery scores. Altogether, these findings provide evidence for a signature of imagery in brain structure, and highlight a common role of perceptual-motor interactions for processing heard and internally generated auditory information.

Indexed as

IndividualityNoiseAcoustic StimulationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAuditory PerceptionBrain MappingCerebral CortexFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaginationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOxygenauditory imageryauditory processingfMRIsupplementary motor areavoxel-based morphometry

Identifiers

PMID26092220
PMCPMC4816805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.